Throughout the Gospels, Christ used many allegories and metaphors to describe and distinguish His people from the infiltrators and devils that He warned us to beware of. In virtually all these teachings, everything good and positive is associated with something white, golden, or shining bright or brassy. Everything bad, negative, and evil is associated with blackness or darkness. For example, He refers to His people allegorically as “the salt (which is white or light colored) of the earth,” “the light of the world,” and “being white for harvest.” He uses comparisons such as “sheep and goats” and “wheat and tares.” The sheep and the wheat are generally white or gold, but nevertheless, they can be difficult to distinguish from the goats and the tares (the infiltrators) which can also be light-colored. Furthermore, the kingdom of heaven was likened to leaven hidden in flour. Lastly, the angel at the tomb of Christ whose “countenance was like lightning” and “raiment white as snow” must have been white. Angels throughout scripture are indistinguishable from men, thus the men of Judea must have been white as well.
When Christ preached, the ordinary people around Him were described as working at jobs that would fit into any white society today. They worked as scribes, lawyers, judges, money-changers, priests, publicans, soldiers, prison wardens, physicians, tanners, fishermen, carpenters, vine-dressers, husbandmen, potters, stewards, tent-makers, and builders. Today we may use modern and updated names such as engineer, plumber, electrician, driver, professor, politician, etc. but nonetheless, we have the same social structures of a thriving white society that existed in the Old Testament. Unless these structures were imposed by colonial whites, the other races never had these structures.
In Mark 13:9-10, Christ foretells that persecutions would come upon His disciples and followers: “But take heed to yourselves: for they shall deliver you up to councils; and in the synagogues ye shall be beaten: and ye shall be brought before rulers and kings for my sake, for a testimony against them. And the gospel must first be published among all nations.” Throughout the entire Roman period, no records exist of non-white people being persecuted for spreading Christianity. Only white Israelites suffered the terrible afflictions of being burnt alive and fed to lions in the name of Christ. Therefore the Judeans who spread the Gospel must have been white.
The apostle Luke was Greek by race and he recorded that Christ came solely to save Israel. He recorded Mary proclaiming in Luke Chapter 1:54-55: “He hath holpen his servant Israel, in remembrance of his mercy; As he spake to our fathers, to Abraham, and to his seed forever.” Luke also quoted Zacharias in Luke 1:71-74: “That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us; To perform the mercy promised to our fathers, and to remember his holy covenant; The oath which he sware to our father Abraham, That he would grant unto us, that we being delivered out of the hand of our enemies might serve him without fear….” If Luke knew that Christ came only for Israelites to fulfill the promise to Abraham, how does that fit with Luke being Greek? What exactly was he doing recording a Gospel for another people? He also quoted Paul of Tarsus in Acts Chapter 26: “I stand accused for the hope of the twelve tribes of Israel.” In other words, Paul’s mission was solely for the Israelites in Europe. Paul must have explained to Luke that Luke was an Israelite just like the Europeans. In Luke Chapter 2, Luke wrote: “There went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed.” Here we see Luke’s idea of “all the world” was solely the Greco-Roman world and did not include other races of people.
In the Gospel of John, John records Christ’s confrontations with His enemies in more detail than do the other gospel writers. John recounts that Christ called His adversaries the descendants of the “murderer from the beginning,” who can only be Cain the first murderer. Also, John notes in his Epistles that Cain was of “the wicked one.” This wicked one can only be a Fallen Angel. He cannot be Adam as Adam was not “the wicked one” because everything Yahweh created was good. When we correlate this information from John with the history of Judea from Flavius Josephus and Strabo, our eyes are truly opened. These historians tell us that Edomites were living in Judea alongside Israelites. For over a century before Christ came, Judea had been gradually infiltrated and subverted by Edomites. From Christ’s comparison, we know that the Edomites looked very similar to the white Israelites. Many Edomites could pass as Israelites, thus making it difficult to know who was who. Since in the succeeding centuries, the Edomites have dogged the Israelites wherever we have gone, we should understand that the Edomites have passed themselves off as Israelites in all of our European civilizations. This fact should lead us to realize who is really in control now. If only our people would listen to Christ’s warnings.
Throughout the Bible, there are numerous mistranslations of certain key words, which when combined, lead to the Bible overall being read and interpreted in a corrupt way. The clear narrative of Fallen Angels creating “Nephilim” or “Fallen One” in opposition to Yahweh God’s creation is obscured. The Adamic race being eternally in opposition to these “Nephilim” or “Seed of the Serpent” is lost as well. Ultimately the true purpose of Yahweh creating the family of Israel to oppose and eventually overcome the “Serpent Seed” goes over people’s heads completely. A warped Christianity prevails in the mind’s of our people, where it is believed that Christ came for everyone to bring all peoples together. As we will see, it is Satan, the race of Cain who desire to mix all peoples together and rule over them just like at the tower of Babel. Whilst Yahweh’s plan is the exact opposite to keep His people Adamic race, which now is predominantly the family of the Israelite Europeans, separated from the other peoples out there.
Nations or Gentiles?
All through out the Bible the term Nation is frequently mistranslated as “Gentiles”. In Hebrew it is “Goyim” and in Greek it is “Ethnos.” Both should virtually always be translated as “Nation”. When combined with the fact that we are taught today that “Gentiles” means “non-Jew,” it leads to entire passages misleading the reader into something they never meant. Generally, this opens the door to the deception into believing that the Jews are the Israelites and the Europeans are the “Gentiles”. Most mistranslations of “Nations” are in verses relating to the spread of Christianity, making it sound like Christ changed everything and sent the Apostles to the “Gentiles.” That the Old Testament is exclusively for the Israelites, but the New Testament changed and under Christianity is universalist for everyone. This is a lie, in reality the Apostles, were going to the many “Nations” which Abraham’s seed was promised to one day become. The nations which had sprung up over the centuries from the Israelites spreading into Europe and building new nations. There is no “Gentiles” or other people outside the Israelites in any of the promises.
Gentile is a Latin word derived from “gentilis.” Originally it meant “of the same clan or race.” It is likely that when the earliest Latin translations in the 3rd and 4th century were made, they translated “Goyim” and “Ethnos” to “Gentilis,” to show they were nations of the same race as the Israelites. However overtime this understanding got obscured and now many centuries later virtually all English translations snuck in this Latin word, obscuring the original meaning. Why did the English translators need to borrow a Latin word into English in order to help understand a Hebrew word which simply means nation? There is no need it should be translated as nation.
Physical Seed or Spiritual Seed?
Where ever the Bible says “seed” or “father,” it is frequently taught this doesn’t mean “physical seed” or a “physical father” but “spiritual seed” and a “spiritual father.” Yahweh made numerous promises to Abraham, Isaac and Jacob that their physical seed would spread everywhere, inherit the world and become many nations. Because most Christians are ignorant that the Europeans are the Israelites, who accomplished all these glorious things, they are duped into believing that the promises must mean “spiritual seed.” That one can become Abraham’s seed, an Israelite or a Christian merely by believing and that is how these promises were fulfilled. That Abraham is a “spiritual father.” Virtually all Christians have been duped into this believe by the antichrists.
However Christianity is Yahweh God, coming down in the flesh to exclusively bring His Israelites back to him and there is no room for any other people. Through out scripture there is one constant narrative, everything is about the physical children of Israel and nobody else. The “spiritual seed” nonsense is an attempt to make Christianity something it is not and never has been, a universal religion. Christianity is not a religion, or a philosophy, rather it is a relationship, a marriage between Yahweh the God of this world and His people, His wife the Israelites. All the promises were fulfilled with the physical Europeans. This is the understanding all Christians should have.
What is Fornication and Adultery?
Fornication primarily means race-mixing, as the Apostle Jude explained it was “the pursuit of different flesh.” In Genesis we learn what a true marriage is where Adam after calling Eve “the flesh of my flesh, the bone of my bone” that “a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh.” An adamite man and a woman, coming together is therefore a true marriage and they would be the same flesh. From this we understand Jude’s reference to “different flesh.” As there was also Nephilim out there, descended from Fallen Angels who were not the same flesh as Adam. Additionally a man sleeping with another man’s wife could be considered fornication, as could “casual sex”. These were out of the bounds of what Adam considered a marriage. When an adamite man and woman slept together they were one flesh, forever.
This brings us to adultery. It is likely during the Old Testament period, adultery meant race-mixing. In the ten commandments, one commandment is “do not commit adultery.” Another is “do not covet your neighbour’s wife.” Did Yahweh give two identical commandments? Or does adultery mean race-mixing and coveting a man’s wife refer to an extramarital affair. Would that not make more sense? Regardless by the New Testament period adultery generally meant an extramarital affair and the new term fornication meant race-mixing.
Today our civilization and culture has been corrupted to add in the concepts of “girlfriends” and “hookups” and “one night stands,” but all of this is non-biblical. Society also encourages woman to divorce their husbands and we have many broken families, with children being raised fatherless. This is all by design of the antichrists. In today’s politically correct world, virtually all Christian teachers hide away from the true meaning of fornication and merely teach that it means adultery.
A Generation or Race?
In the New Testament, race is frequently mistranslated to generation, which filters down the direct message Christ, John the Baptist and others made with their disparaging remarks to their opponents (the Pharisees and Sadducees). For example when they asked Christ for a sign, he responded: “A wicked and adulterous race seeks a sign, and a sign shall not be given to it.” (Matthew 12:39 CNT) So Christ had no interest in converting them, based on their race. Then when talking about the resurrection, He explained that the “men of Nineveh shall rise up in the judgment with this race and they shall condemn it.” So even the Assyrians will be in the resurrection but Christ’s opponent wouldn’t be, due to their race.
Christ compared the kingdom of heaven to “a net cast into the sea and it gathers from out of every race.” Then as for where the races go “the good ones into vessels, but the rotten ones they cast out.” Here we see clearly, heaven only lets a good race in and the evil ones are tossed out. It has nothing to do with believers and non-believers. All of Christ’s other parables describe is in a like manner, it is consistent. Christ’s separates on sight, due to race, not behaviour.
John the Baptists refereed to his opponents as a “race of Vipers.” He was linking them to the Serpent of Genesis, i.e. the Fallen Angels, that his opponents were descended from them. All of these teachings can be argued away when “generation” is used instead of “race.” With the true translation, the Gospel reads quite differently.
Jews, Judahites or Judeans?
The term “Jew” did not get used until much later, after the New Testament was written. Generally wherever the translators have “Jew” it should be “Judean” instead. After the Babylon deportations, some Judahites, Benjaminites and Levites returned and rebuilt a nation, which became known as Judea. However as we’ve explained, later the Judeans began converting surrounding nations and peoples, particularly the Edomites. From that time forwards, being a Judean lost the meaning of being a racial ethnic distinction and simply became a political distinction. Furthermore Judea came under the rule of Rome and simply became a province within the Empire, becoming even more of a melting pot of mixed people now calling themselves Judeans.
Just like today British, or American does not mean the original racial stock of people who founded the nation. Therefore when reading the New Testament, you should realize not only should “Jew” be translated as “Judean.” But also it simply meant someone living in Judea, who could be of any race, so long as they followed the Judean customs of the time. With this understanding you will realize that during Christ’s ministry there were some legitimate Israelites, but also many imposters. The mistranslations lump them all together as one group. With this, we understand why Christ was continuously stalked, hounded and harassed by his opponents. They weren’t Israelites, but they were Judeans. We also understand why Christ warns of “those who call themselves Judeans but are not and are the synagogue of Satan.” Satan being all the descendants of the Fallen Angels collectively. Synagogue meaning the gathering, the organization, the leadership of these hordes, to invade the lands of the true Israelites (Europe).
What is the World?
The term “World” generally refers to the scope of where the Adamic race is, not geographically the entire land mass of the world. By the time of Abraham the narrative shifts more narrowly, to where the children of Israel are and the rest of the Adamic race are ignored. “World” is often mistranslated from the Hebrew word “Erets” which simply means land. For example Noah’s flood covered the whole “land” where the Adamic race was. However under the false narrative of a modern universalistic view which always tries to insist that all races in the world descended from Noah. They must also insist the flood covered the whole world. However, if we examine other examples of “Erets” such as during the plagues of Egypt, is is translated that the plagues came upon “the whole land [Erets].” We can see clearly see that this was a localized event, yet when Noah’s flood is mentioned it is instead translated as “the whole world [Erets].”
When you realize the flood was local, that there were non-Adamic people who survived the flood, then you’re whole world view and biblical view will change. Noah’s flood was intended to destroy the sinful Adamites, but some of the descendants of Cain and Nephilim survived. Furthermore the spread of Christianity to the whole world, in the context of the Israelites being the world, so only to them. Any other people outside that are irrelevant. As Solomon explained: “For in the long garment was the whole world, and in the four rows of the stones was the glory of the fathers graven, and thy Majesty upon the diadem of his head.” (Wisdom of Solomon chapter 18:2) In other words, the twelve stones for each tribe upon the high priest represented the whole world, the twelve tribes of Israel are the whole world. That is the lens you should read the Bible through.
The two Mans – Adam & Enosh
In the Bible there is the Hebrew word “Adam”, referring to Adam and/or his descendants (Adamites), but then there are also other Hebrew words to describe different races of men. From this we can gleam that we are not all the same and do not all share the same origin. The Hebrew word “Enosh” which means “mortal man,” sometimes can describe Adamites (usually in a derogatory manner) but sometimes non-Adamites. You must always examine the context. For example Moses said: “Thou turnest man [Enosh] to destruction; and sayest, Return, ye children of men [Adam].” (Psalm 90:3 KJV) Here we see that all “men” die, but Adamites specifically, upon death return to Yahweh due to the immortal spirit breathed into him. Without the distinction of Enosh and Adam in this verse this teaching is lost in the Psalm.
In Genesis we read “this is the book of the generations of Adam.” It the story of the descendants of Adam and his descendants only. By the end of Genesis it has moved onto to the Israelites exclusively, although they are still Adamites, just one peculiar family of Adamites. Anyone else mentioned is generally only if the Israelites come into contact with them. The Genesis 10 table of nations is so that we can understand and trace people back to Adam or realize they are not from Adam. For example we see later on in Scripture that there are Nephilim, Rephaim, Zuzim, Kenizzites, Kadmonites, Girgashites. These races are from the Fallen Angels. Mixing with the was forbidden, but if they did the result would be bastard offspring.
What is a Mamzer?
The Hebrew word “mamzer” means a mixed race, non-Adamite. Generally most translations have “mamzer” as “bastard.” This is fine if “bastard” is understood in it’s true meaning. However Churches generally teach they only they the authority to marry couples and teach that a “bastard” is someone born to unmarried parents. Unmarried in the sense a Priest did not marry them officially at an altar. This is a complete heresy and changes the definition of a “bastard.” Churches will also happily accept mixed races of people into their congregation so long a priest married them. Yahweh states that “A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.” Deuteronomy 23:2 KJV
When Adam and Eve lay together there was no priest, the same can be said with all the Patriarchs through the Bible. Furthermore when Tamar seduced Judah and birthed Pharez and Zarah there was no priest, it was a one night stand, yet in the eyes of God that was a marriage, Judah and Tamar were now husband and wife. Christ came through the line of this marriage and he was certainly never counted as a bastard. However when Esau married the daughters of Heth, all of his offspring would be “bastards” as he had mixed offspring. This we understand why Yahweh hated Esau as he knew his actions ahead of time. That is the true understanding of a “mamzer” and a “bastard” which the churches do not teach today.
Strangers, Guests and Aliens
These are various Hebrew words for strangers, guests and aliens in the Bible, yet they often all get translated as “stranger” which causes inconsistency and confusion. When a non-Israelite entered the land they may expect to receive certain rights and privileges based upon this. Generally Adamic people had to be treated friendly, whilst non-Adamites were shown no such privileges. This is why Moses went to Cush which would have been Arabia at the time and married a Midianite, and that was fine. Yet when Esau married Hittities he lost the birth right, as the Hitties had intermarried with the race of Cain, therefore Esau’s descendants would be mixed. That is the clear distinction. Jacob’s wife were Pagans yet his twelve sons were blessed, therefore it clearly is not the belief, but race that matters.
Furthermore another seemingly inconsistency is not understanding that once the children of Israel had settled in the lands of Canaan for a few centuries, they began calling Israelites by the region they lived in. For example Ruth, who is in Christ’s genealogy is referred to as “Ruth the Moabite.” She was an Israelite living in former lands of Moab, but was called a Moabite for that reason. Antichrists would insist that Christ had a Moabite in this ancestry, but that is not the case.
An Arab is also a bastard and based on mamzer
As we have explained Arab means “to be mixed” and when referring to people means “mixed people.” During the time of King Solomon (950 BC) the land of Cush got renamed to Arabia and consisted of various tribes intermixed, including Edomites and Canaanites. As a result Israelites could never be sure of the origin of the people living. Thus they were all labelled as “Arabs.” Mamzer is more definite, meaning a non-Adamite. Whilst Arabs were considered mixed but there still could be some Adamites remaining there at that time. Over the centuries we can be sure by now there no longer are.
Holy, Sanctified and Saints
The Israelites are a Holy race to Yahweh their God, because He has separated them from the rest of the world: “you shall be a special treasure to Me above all people; for all the earth is Mine. And ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and an holy nation.” That itself is the true meaning of Holy, something “separated and dedicated to God.” Thus a so called Christian priest or whomever can never make anything holy, as it is something only Yahweh himself can do and he only separated the children of Israel, nobody else.
Therefore all Europeans are holy and they exclusively are the saints and sacred and sanctified, nobody else. This is why Peter is his Epistles referred to the Europeans as a “Holy Race.” Whilst Israelites in this life can be disobedient and follow the world instead of Yahweh, ultimately in the next life they will accept Christ as his blood has already cleansed them.
Satan, the Serpent Seed and the Devil
Most Christians today falsely believe this is some supernatural fallen angel floating around that is “The Satan” and is behind everything evil in the world. In reality that Satanic entity is identified in Genesis 3:15 “I will put emnity between thy seed and the seed of the woman.” The Seed of the Serpent aka the Seed of he Fallen Angels are all collectively “The Satan.” They are eternally opposed to Yahweh’s Adamic creation aka the seed of the woman. Therefore there is an entire race of beings on this earth which are collectively “The Satan.”
However the word “Satan” itself is another harmless basic Hebrew word which simply means adversary or opponent. If you play a game of chess, then your opponent would be a “satan.” Therefore when Christ said to Peter “Get behind me Satan.” He simply meant Peter was being adversarial to Christ as he was trying to prevent Christ from dieing which was necessary to save the children of Israel. Once Peter repented he was no longer a “satan.” An Israelite can choose to be obedient or not, his choices in life will determine his reward in heaven. Non-Adamics do not have this option they are collectively part of “Satan” regardless of their actions. They are corruptions of Yahweh’s creation and opposed to his Adamic creation.
Christ himself explained this in the end times parable of the sower: “He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man;The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one; The enemy that sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the world; and the reapers are the angels. As therefore the tares are gathered and burned in the fire; so shall it be in the end of this world.” Here we see that our interpretation is uphold by Christ himself who tells there are seed in this world sown by the devil which he explains in revelation are the Fallen Angels.
Therefore whilst we in this life can have our own personal enemies amongst our own people, we can understand Christ telling us to “turn the other cheek.” Meaning to not hold grudges and be quick to forgive our own people. We should certainly NOT have this attitude with non-Adamic people as they are Christ’s enemies, therefore also our enemies and we are commanded to remain separate from them.
Nephilim and Giants
In Genesis 6 we learn that the Fallen Angels produced offspring by mating with Adamic woman. However the result, their descendants is mistranslated to “giants” from the Hebrew word “Nephilim.” A better translation would be “fallen ones.” The Angels that rebelled and corrupted Yahweh’s creation fell from grace and produced a fallen race, hence the name “fallen ones.” Whilst evidently some Nephilim grew to be a gigantic size, not all of them were.
In Enoch we also learn that the Fallen Angels mixed all of creation together, creating monsters and hybrid races, so they weren’t only mixing with Adamic woman. Thus if Noah’s flood was local and his ark landed somewhere in the Middle East. The Adamic civilization restarted there and all Adamic families looked the same. Gradually they encountered other races as they spread out. The Caananites who originally were Adamic intermixed with Nephilim, therefore their descendants would be Nephilim and we understand what happened when the spies sent out by Moses reported back: “we saw the Nephilim, the sons of Anak, who come of the Nephilim; and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers.” Evidently some were of gigantic stature and we also see here that the Nephilim survived the flood.
We Europeans also have discovered numerous races as we spread out across the world. Logically they must be remnants of the Nephilim descended from the fallen angels before the flood. We must realize every non-Adamic biped’s origin must be with the Fallen Angels and they are all Nephilim. When Christ warns us that the end times will be like the days of Noah, looking around all of our cities and nations today, how we have become completely overrun. We should realize we are in the days of Noah right now and surrounded by Nephilim just like Noah and his family was thousands of years ago.
Devils and Demons
Throughout the New Testament Christ is casting out “demons,” which are described as evil spirits which posses men. However a few times the translation can be confusing, as it interchangeably uses “devil” and “demon.” Simply put a “devil” is a more up to date name for the archaic Hebrew word of “Nephilim.” Evidently “devils” and “Nephilim” can look very close to an adamite. Whilst a “demon” is the result when a devil dies, an evil bodiless spirit that roams the earth. Evidently Adamite have an immortal spirit but non-adamites have an evil corrupt spirit. When Christ returns he will destroy them all.
The important thing to note is Christ tells us speaking to the Pharisees that “they are of their father the devil and he was a murderer from the beginning.” They descend from Cain who was the first murderer and that Cain was a “devil.” This statement alone proves two seedline. That Cain couldn’t be the son of Adam, as if he was how could he be a devil? But if he was descended from a Fallen Angel, he would be part Angel, part Adamite and therefore not part of Yahweh’s creation and therefore a bastard, a nephilim a devil. In addition all of his descendants would be devils, as kind begets kind and we understand why the Pharisees and all their descendants are devils as well.
Satyrs and Shades
In the Old Testament is a point where the Hebrew word “Nephilim” falls out of use and instead “satyr” is used until the New Testament period and “Devil” is used. A “satyr” originally was part man and part beast, most notably part ape. So the Israelites understood there were “men” out there who were part beast and part fallen angel. In the Dead Sea Scroll version of Enoch we may see why: “[ . . . two hundred] 2donkeys, two hundred asses, two hundred . . . rams of the] 3flock, two hundred goats, two hundred [ . . . beast of the] 4field from every animal, from every [bird . . . ] 5[ . . . ] for miscegenation [ . . . ]” (1Q23 Frag. 1 + 6) This is heavily fragmented, but we can make out that the angels mixed their seed even with animal kind. Therefore the Nephilim not only are part angel and part adamite, but also part beast. Thus we understand why the term “satyr” might be applied.
Being Saved – Salvation or Preservation?
In the Bible there is salvation which is being saved with an eternal life and then it preservation which is being saved in this life and can also include your seed being preserved. Most Christians these days falsely believe that one’s owns actions can determine if you are saved in the afterlife, when in reality Christ saved the entire Adamic race. As for being preserved, most don’t fully comprehend that only Abraham’s seed through Jacob had a guarente from Yahweh that they would be preserved until the very end, i.e. the return of Christ. All other Adamic families in the Middle East gradually got mixed out of existance. But realizing there is a racialAdamic salvation we understand why Christ explained that one day in the ressurection “The men of Ninnevah” meaning the Assyrians and the “Queen of the South”, meaning the Sabeans (Cushites) will be there with us, as well as the pre flood Adamites that Christ went to visit before being ressurected. Even though all of these people have nothing to do with Christianity, they are Adamites and therefore will be ressurected.
Therefore it is important to truly understand why someone has an afterlife. Adam was given an immortal spirit which was breathed into them and originally Adam was created to be immortal. Christ explained the only way to get in heaven was with “spirit and water”, meaning you must be an Adamite and possess the spirit. He also clearly explained the sheep go to heaven and the goats to the lake of fire. It’s not good sheep and good goats seperated from bad sheep or bad goats. Their actions and believes are never taken into account. Rather Christ seperates them on sight, either they are a sheep or they are a goat and that it was truly matters. The same can be said with the parables of the wheats and the tares, the race of good fish and bad fish. It’s always seperated on sight based on their kind.
So the Israelites were warned by Yahweh they would be preserved but it came with a catch, that he would punish them for their sins in this life: “You only have I known of all the families of the earth: therefore I will punish you for all your iniquities.” (Amos 3:2) this is what John the Baptists decribes as Christ immerssing us in fire: “He shall immerse you in the Holy Spirit, and in fire!” Meaning if we breaks his commandments we can expect punishment in this life to correct us. Paul explained to the Corinthians in regards to what they should do to a fornicator in their community: “deliver such a wretch to the Adversary, for destruction of the flesh, in order that the Spirit may be preserved in the day of the Prince.” (1 Corinthians 5:5 CNT) Here we see that the Pagan world was equivalent to being delivered to the adversary but also crucially that despite his sins, the man would still be preserved and be in heaven on day.
Overall therefore we should only have brotherly love for our own kin. What truly matters is that we as a people repent and turn away from the wicked world, with Mystery Babylon we live in, that is what Yahweh truly wants us collectively to do. If one believes that salvation is personal that a persons believes or actions in this life decide whether they can be saved then it opens the door to the false believe that non-Adamites can be saved or that an Adamite can somehow condemn himself to destruction. You can see how not have an understanding of the truth leads to all sorts of problems and false believes.
“If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” – 2 Chronicles 7:14
Most Old Testament translations are correct; however, a few major mistranslations and misconceptions do exist, especially in Genesis. The New Testament is based on the Old Testament, and Genesis (the first book) sets out the story, theme, and narrative of the entire Bible. So if you have Genesis wrong, you’ll have the other books wrong. It’s vital to understand Genesis correctly if we’re to understand what the Bible is teaching us.
The two Trees in the Garden of Eden
We’ll start with Adam and Eve in the garden. Genesis tells us that two certain trees were different from all the other trees in the garden. The other trees were planted in the ground and were good for food. Obviously, they were physical trees. The two different trees, however, were not planted but stood in the midst of the garden amongst the other trees. Called the Tree of Life and the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, they represented races of people. The Tree of Life was the Adamic creation of Adam and Eve and their white descendants. The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil was made up of the Fallen Angels and their evil offspring which were corruptions of Yahweh’s creation.
In scripture, trees are frequently used to describe races and families. Even today we talk about family trees. Christ described Himself as a tree: “I am the true vine, and my Father is the husbandman” and “I am the vine; you are the branches.” Christ is Yahweh God who created the Adamic race and thus He is the trunk of the tree and all Adamites are the branches. Paul in his Epistle to the Romans described them as a “wild olive tree” and contrasted them to the Israelites who were a “cultivated olive tree.”
The Book of Revelation tells us that after Christ has destroyed His enemies, the Tree of Life will still remain and will produce twelve fruits. These twelve fruits can only be the twelve tribes of Israel that grew out of the Adamic race. The fruit shows that they excelled over the other Adamic nations. In Revelation, we see no sign of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Since the Tree of Life represents a race — the Adamic race — then the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil must also represent a race or races. The racial story that began with the sin of race-mixing in the Garden of Eden reaches its conclusion in Revelation when Yahweh’s Tree of Life ultimately overcomes the evil tree.
At times, Christ used trees as allegories for individuals and families, such as this parable in Matthew 17:17-19: “So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.” Here He is explaining that when Adamic people marry and bear Adamic children, they are producing good fruit because everything Yahweh created was good. Regardless of what type of persons those Adamic children grow up to be, their genetics will be good and they will possess the spirit of Yahweh which He breathed into Adam. But non-Adamic people are bad trees because they are corruptions of Yahweh’s creation. Whatever life they live, they can only produce bad fruit, which is corrupt children. This parable teaches us that the two trees in Genesis should never mix.
Of course, you can insist that these two trees in Genesis are literal trees and that Adam and Eve’s sin was to eat literal fruit — maybe an apple — that Yahweh had for some reason forbidden. But there is never any mention of trees in this manner throughout the Bible. The entire narrative of the two trees is about two separate races of people. First is the Adamic race which later became supplanted by one Adamic family, the Israelites. The other is the Nephilim and Kennites who descended from the Fallen Angels. The trees being races fits because the Bible is a book about race. Any other way of seeing these two trees is just a fairy tale and doesn’t make sense in the scope of the Bible.
Adam & Eve Eating the Fruit
It’s vital to understand what “eating of the fruit” really means. Yahweh gave Adam one command and one command only: “Do not eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil.” This means not to mix seed (race-mix) or even interact with the Fallen Angels and their corrupted offspring. But Eve was seduced by the Serpent, and we learn in Revelation that the term Serpent is an allegory for the Fallen Angels. Thus she committed a grave sin. Then Adam accepted the pregnant Eve and lay with her as his wife. He did not reject her sin. In the eyes of the law, Adam was just as guilty as Eve and this was enough to cause his fall from grace.
In the Bible, the term “to eat” is frequently used as an allegory for sexual intercourse. Proverbs 20 talks about an adulterous woman: “Such is the way of an adulterous woman; she eateth, and wipeth her mouth, and saith, I have done no wickedness.” Here adulterous sexual relations were described as eating. Proverbs 9 says: “Stolen waters are sweet, and bread eaten in secret is pleasant.” Here the thrill of sleeping around is described as bread eaten in secret. Thus in Genesis eating from a forbidden tree can certainly refer to sexual intercourse with a forbidden party.
Genesis says: “Eve ate of the tree and then gave to her husband.” You can insist that if Eve lay sexually with a Fallen Angel, this means that Adam also lay with a Fallen Angel as he ate as well. But there is another interpretation, that Adam lay with Eve who was already pregnant with the Fallen Angel’s offspring. By doing this, Adam took a sinner as his wife and so he “ate” as well. Technically, by sleeping with and marrying Eve, he took the evil Cain as his son.
Look at it this way: If someone commits murder or another grievous crime and you know what they did and then you take that person as your spouse, you are complicit in their crime. Instead, you should denounce the crime and reject that person and have nothing to do with them. Adam should have rejected Eve and waited for Yahweh’s instructions. He had more ribs so a new wife could have been made. But he didn’t do the right thing. He accepted Eve and now we all die, yet through Christ, we will one day be resurrected.
The birth of Cain – Genesis 4:1
And so Eve gave birth to Cain. Most Christians insist that Adam is Cain’s father. Yet there is only one verse in the entire Bible that seems to suggest this and no other second witness. But in John’s Epistle, he says “Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one.” This is saying that either Adam is the wicked one or that Cain had a different father! Furthermore, in John Chapter 8, Christ says to his opponents: “Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning.” The first murderer was Cain, and Christ is calling him a devil. Then Christ adds: “When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it.” What does “and the father of it” mean? The Greek may just as correctly be read as “and his father,” referring to Cain’s true father, who was a devil. If Cain was a devil, it is because his real father was the devil. Kind begets kind. Thus if you insist that Adam was the father of Cain, you are inserting a contradiction between Christ and Genesis.
If we take a closer look at Genesis 4:1 in the original Hebrew, we see problems. In Hebrew, Eve speaks of birthing Cain: “I have acquired a man with Yahweh.” If Adam were Cain’s father, this is quite a strange statement and seems incomplete. Most Bible translations attempt to repair the verse and elaborate, generally adding words such as: “I have acquired a man with the help of Yahweh.” This shows that most translators found the original Hebrew problematic, as they needed to add words to make sense of it.
It is also interesting to note that the root meaning of the Hebrew word Cain is “acquired” and the root meaning of Abel is “breath.” This certainly would make sense as Abel inherited the breath of life from Yahweh as he was Adam’s son, but Cain was an acquisition from a Fallen Angel and was thus a corruption whom Adam adopted.
There have been discoveries of ancient Genesis translations in which Israelites tried to repair Genesis 4:1. One is the Aramaic Targums, which are among the earliest interpretations of the Hebrew Scriptures. The Targum Onkelos states: “And Adam knew Hava his wife, who had desired the Angel; and she conceived, and bare Kain; and she said, I have acquired a man, the Angel of the Lord.” Similarly, Targum pseudo-Jonathan reads: “And Adam knew that his wife Eve had conceived from Sammael the Angel (of death) and she became pregnant and bore Cain. And he was like those on high and not like those below. And she said: ‘I have got a man from the angel of the LORD.’” These passages show that from an early time, some Israelites were aware of the problems with Genesis 4:1.
Obviously, there’s a problem, but how did that happen? In Jeremiah’s time (600 BC), the Kennites, the descendants of Cain, had gained positions within the Kingdom of Judah as scribes. The scribes would typically copy the scriptures onto new parchments to keep the scriptures preserved. But Jeremiah asks: “How can you say, ‘We are wise, And the Law of the LORD is with us?’ But behold, the lying pen of the scribes has made it into a lie.” This indicates that the Kennites had been trying to corrupt the laws and scriptures. Would Genesis 4:1 not have been their primary target? The race of Cain was trying to obscure the origin of Cain, their ancestor, and to hide that they were descended from the Fallen Angel and thus were an evil corrupt race. However, this was all the plan of Yahweh because as Christ, He would re-reveal the truth to His people. As Luke remarked: “Christ came to reveal things kept hidden from the foundation of the world.” What hidden things was Christ revealing?
He revealed the truth of Genesis. He is the ultimate authority when reading scripture and He tells us that Cain is not from Adam and that the Devil, the Fallen Angels, sowed seed amongst the Adamic creation. The results were Cain and the Nephilim. We have a simple explanation: Adam slept with his wife Eve who was already pregnant with Cain from a Fallen Angel. She gave birth to Cain, then to Abel. This gives us the true meaning behind that twisted scripture Genesis 4:1. This explanation reveals the truth of Christ’s parables of wheat and tares, sheep and goats good fish and bad fish. It explains why when Christ returns, He will need to divide everyone by race.
Misunderstood Verses in Genesis
Now a quick run through of some misunderstood verses. Where Yahweh explains the consequences of Adam and Eve’s fall from grace: “And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life; 18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field.” The thorns here are an allegory for people. They are Cain and the race of Cain. They would bring war and suffering upon the descendant of Adam.
In Joshua’s invasion. Yahweh commanded the Israelites to exterminate them all, or at least a large portion of them in the Canaanites. But the Israelites failed, instead they made treaties and put them under tribute. We are suffering the consequences of our ancestors failure and now we are enslaved under their banking system as a result.
The next one is generally always mistranslated is where Yahweh says: “And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:” This seems to imply that Yahweh does NOT want Adam to eat of the tree of life. Earlier on in Genesis Yahweh stated Adam can eat of the tree of life but NOT the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. Did Yahweh suddenly change his mind?
A few translations do get this right, Yahweh is encouraging Adam, meaning the Adamic race to eat and only eat of the tree of life. The Tree of life is the Adamic race. If you want to pass down that immortal spirit to your descendants, then only marry Adamites. That is essentially what this verse is explaining. If you mix with Nephilim your descendants will be bastards and not possess that immortal spirit.
Lastly where Yahweh explains to Cain why his sacrifice was not accepted: “If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him.” By “sin lieth at the door,” this means his origin, his opening to the world, his conception. Cain’s birth was a sin as he was a bastard and if he can’t do well it is because he is a bastard. His genetics are corrupt, there in lays the problem.
Both Christ and John the Baptist also challenged their adversaries, who were descendants of Cain: “to do well.” Obviously, like Cain they couldn’t, because like their ancestor, they were bastards. The lesson here, is bastards can never do well.
The Giants in Genesis 6
This brings us to Genesis 6. As we’ve said elsewhere, “Giants” should be translated as “Nephilim” or “Fallen Ones.” The verse that says “the sons of God came unto the daughter of men” is frequently twisted and misinterpreted as Cain’s descendants and Seth’s descendants. However, when the Enoch literature describes the same account, the phrase is “sons of heaven.” In some manuscripts of the Septuagint (the Greek translation), it is merely “angels.” Thus Genesis 6 is clearly race-mixing between Fallen Angels and Adamites which led to the destruction of the race of Adam as punishment.
After the Fallen Angels had corrupted the Adamic creation, Yahweh destroyed all Adamites except for Noah who was “pure in his generation [race].” What sin did the other Adamic people commit? Yahweh had given only one law that was punishable by death: not to eat of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil. That was the only law they could have broken. Did they all eat forbidden apples or did they all race mix? Obviously, they race-mixed with the Fallen Angels and later with their evil offspring.
Noah’s flood was a local event, not worldwide. The worldwide flood is a misinterpretation. The words “earth” and “world” can also be translated as “land.” The following verse could be interpreted quite differently if the word “earth” had been translated as land: “And, behold, I, even I, do bring a flood of waters upon the earth [the land], to destroy all flesh, wherein is the breath of life, from under heaven; and everything that is in the earth [the land] shall die.” Only the Adamic race had the “breath of life.” Thus here it is saying the flood only covered where the Adamic race dwelt.
The next misconception is that Noah took every single animal and living thing in existence into the ark. Did Noah really take animal species that only exist in Australia or South America? Most artwork comically depicts Noah taking giraffes and monkeys and so on. Did he take the billions of insect species, birds, reptiles, and mammals? That is ridiculous. Noah merely took the animals required to restart civilization. When he stepped off the ark, he needed enough animals to survive until the land healed. Since the flood was local, the Adamites would gradually spread out into the rest of the world which was untouched by the flood. But until that time, Noah and his family needed to survive.
Edomites our or enemies? – Deuteronomy 23:7
The final main problematic verse in the Old Testament seems to state that the Israelites should NOT abhor the Edomites. This is clearly an error and goes against the rest of the Bible. The word should be Aramites: “Thou shalt not abhor an Edomite [Aramite]; for he is thy brother: thou shalt not abhor an Egyptian; because thou wast a stranger in his land.” In Hebrew, the word Adam could mean Adam the first man, or an Adamite, or to blush, or something ruddy in color. But a fifth possibility exists. Esau the brother of Jacob was renamed Adam. However, for clarity’s sake, his new name was generally translated as Edom to distinguish Esau from the first Adam.
Why was Esau’s name changed? Adamites have physical bodies plus they have Yahweh’s spirit which He breathed into the first Adam. When Adamites are making decisions, they can follow the carnal desires of the flesh (as Adam did) or they can follow the spirit. Esau followed his carnal desires by taking Canaanite wives, and thus he was renamed Adam. But Jacob followed the spirit by obeying the commands of his parents and traveling thousands of miles to find a wife from amongst his own kin. He was renamed Israel which means “He who rules with God.” Jacob was blessed and Esau was cursed. The rest of the Adamic race did as Esau did, followed their carnal lusts, strayed away from Yahweh into paganism, and mixed their bloodline into oblivion.
The other important thing here is that Abraham’s family was from the land of Aram. Aram is generally translated as Syria. Thus the Israelites would have had ancestors and relations living in Aram/Syria who could be referred to as “thy brother.” Additionally, Jacob made a binding oath with Laban that there would be peace between their offspring. Laban’s offspring dwelt in Syria and could also have been referred to as “thy brother.” Thus Yahweh commanded that the Israelites be friendly to the Aramites aka Syrians.
Linguistically, the confusion is easy to explain. In Hebrew, Adam would be spelled ADM – Aleph Dalet Mem, whilst Aram would be spelled ARM – Aleph Resh Mem. In modern block Hebrew, the D (Dalet) and the R (Resh) are so similar that it can be extremely difficult to tell the two letters apart. Thus Adam and Aram are easy to mix up since Edom is technically just Adam.
Yahweh declared that He hated Esau and that He would destroy all of Esau’s descendants. This is understandable as Esau intermarried with the Canaanites who in turn had intermarried with the Kennites and Nephilim. Yahweh would not be double-minded and expect His people the Israelites to be friendly to His enemies. From the time of King David, Israel ruled over both the lands of Aram (Syria) as well as the lands of the Edomites. The Aramites were treated fairly, whilst the Edomites were enslaved. The command by Yahweh was obeyed.
We can find other examples of Syria and Edom getting mixed up. For example in 2 Samuel Chapter 8:13-14: “And David gat him a name when he returned from smiting of the Syrians in the valley of salt, being eighteen thousand men. And he put garrisons in Edom; throughout all Edom put he garrisons, and all they of Edom became David’s servants. And the LORD preserved David whithersoever he went.” David did not smite the Syrians and then teleport to Edom. Rather this passage should read that he smote the Edomites there. There are many more examples of the Dalet and Resh getting mixed up in translations. We should be aware of this and not allow ourselves to be tricked into thinking Edomites are our friends.
Isn’t it interesting that the primary mistranslated and misinterpreted verses relate to the two seedlines doctrine, which is perhaps the most important message of the Bible, particularly for our times? Two seedlines reveal the race and origin of Cain and his cursed descendants. It tells us that the Edomites are the same race as Cain. Isn’t it suspicious how specific verses relating to the identity of our enemies are obscured? It’s almost as if our enemies are trying to keep us blind as they destroy us.
The New Testament is more often incorrectly translated than the Old Testament. This has led to several huge distortions and corruptions. For example, Christ and His apostles continuously warn of the devil races and link them specifically to Cain and the Fallen Angels. However, this teaching is largely obscured due to poor and misleading translations. In addition, the fact that the Israelites are Yahweh’s exclusive people is generally stated clearly in the Old Testament. However, in the New Testament, translators assumed that the Israelites had disappeared and/or were the real Jews. Therefore the translations often twist the meaning of words to say that Yahweh gave up on His people, broke His covenant, and that Christianity is a universal religion mainly concerned with the “Gentiles.” These mistranslations are dangerous because they prevent us Europeans from realizing that we are the real Israelites and that all the prophecies talk about us. Additionally, the mistranslations obscure the fact that we are surrounded by evil races bent on our destruction. Unbeknownst to the translators, their folly has protected the enemies of Yahweh and has greatly aided them in infiltrating and subverting our societies.
The gospel that the enemies of Yahweh hate most is the Gospel of John. As we go through the mistranslations, we’ll see why. The opening of John Chapter 1 verses 11 to 13 explains the purpose of Christ’s coming. Let’s start with the mistranslation: “He came unto his own, and his own received him not. But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name: Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.” The first part implies that Christ’s own people rejected Him. The second part implies that anyone can become a son of God, i.e., can become a Christian simply by believing in Christ. And the last part implies that all this is the will of God.
A much better translation is: “He came into His own land, and the men of the country received Him not. But as many who received Him, He gave to them the authority which children of God are to attain, to those believing in His name: not those from of mixed origin, nor those from of the desire of the flesh, nor from of the will of man, but they who have been born from God.” Here we see that the majority of people in Judea rejected Christ because they were Edomites, but that the Israelites amongst them did accept Him as Christ. All Adamites (not Edomites) are sons of God, and in time, the Israelites supplanted the other Adamites. But then the Israelites strayed from Yahweh and He divorced them, dispersed them, and cast them off. Yet when Christ came, the Israelites could reclaim their position as Yahweh’s people. The last part makes it clear those of mixed origin, i.e., the race of Cain and the Nephilim would always be rejected. Thus we see that only Israelites can attain the position of a Christian.
Born From Above
The next horrifically badly translated verse is John Chapter 3:3. This mistranslation has led to entire false doctrines being invented. “Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Most Christians have been duped into imagining that believing in Christ makes you “born again” and thus magically turns someone into a Christian and “saves” them. A more accurate translation is “born from above.” Being born from above means being descended from Adam because Adam was Yahweh’s creation. Cain and the Nephilim are from beneath as they were made in corruption and sin by the Fallen Angels. This is why Christ tells His adversaries: “I am from above, you are from beneath.” The Greek word translated as “above” in this verse is the same word mistranslated in John 3:3. Christ states that if a man is NOT born from above “he cannot see the kingdom of God.” He made it crystal clear that if you have NOT descended Adam (from above) you are NOT getting into heaven. “Born again” is an invention by various translators. The Bible simply does not say that. We cannot invent doctrines out of something Christ never actually said.
Hell, Hades, or Lake of Fire?
Throughout Christ’s ministry, He frequently used these three terms: “Hades,” “Gehenna,” and the “Lake of Fire.” Each has a different meaning; however, they are often treated interchangeably and get mistranslated as “hell.” As we’ve explained previously, Hades is the Greek term for the Underworld, the abode of the dead. Hades is “Sheol” in Hebrew. Adamites have an eternal spirit so when they die, their bodies decay but their spirits abide in Hades/Sheol awaiting Christ’s second coming. Peter explained that Hades is where Christ visited the “spirits in prison” during the three days between His death and resurrection when He preached the gospel “also to them that are dead.” Here we see that an Adamite can turn to Christ after death, which is entirely opposite to the teachings of most modern churches. Christ states in Revelation that He will “destroy Hades and Death,” and all Adamite spirits will be released and return to Him in heaven. There will no longer be death for Adamites. It’s as simple and cut and dry as that. There is no “hell.”
So where do the other two terms fit into this? Gehenna is a compound Hebrew word. It refers to the “valley of Hinnom,” the wicked place where in Jeremiah’s time the Israelites sacrificed their children as burnt offerings to Baal. When Christ used the word Gehenna, He was referring allegorically to the fiery trials in this life. This includes the chastisement Yahweh visits on the Israelites when they stray. As in the literal Gehenna, one’s body may be allegorically burned during these fiery trials. One’s body may be punished or even destroyed in this life. However, the eternal Adamic soul will be saved. Therefore it is important to distinguish between the words Hades and Gehenna in order to understand what Christ is saying.
The third term — the “lake of fire” — refers to the complete destruction awaiting all non-Adamic peoples. As Christ explained in the parable of dividing the nations, the sheep and goat nations will be finally and definitively be separated from each other. The two nations are the Israelites and the non-Adamics. Their fate is then outlined: “These [goat nations] will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous [sheep nations] into eternal life.” Here “eternal punishment” should be translated as “lake of fire.” This means they cease to exist completely and forever.
Churches teach that you could spend eternity in hell if you don’t obey your priest and attend church. These teachings do not follow scripture because scripture clearly states that your origin determines your destiny. Christ has saved His Adamic creation, so Adamites will be restored and judged for the life they led. Since we Adamites have eternal life, Yahweh has good reason for punishing and chastising us in this life. He is correcting us and making us better. But since all non-Adamites will be tossed into the lake of fire and destroyed utterly, they are never corrected and punished for their actions in this life. Mistranslating “hell” misleads and obscures this truth. It clouds our understanding and leads us to believe that some of our own people might not make it to heaven. This leaves the door open for accepting non-Adamics as Christians and even brethren.
Simon the Canaanite?
Of Christ’s twelve apostles it seems that one, Simon, was a Caananite. But wouldn’t it be hypocritical of Yahweh to command the Israelites to slay all the Canaanites and then when He came down as a man, to choose a Caananite as an apostle? However, having said that, it is clear that Judas Iscariot was an Edomite, but there is a good reason for that.
Firstly, let’s deal with Judas Iscariot. Christ needed to die to save Israel and prophecy foretold that a friend would betray Him to His enemies. That’s why Judas was chosen. Christ knew Judas would betray him due to Judas’ evil Edomite nature. No Israelite would spend eternity in heaven knowing he had betrayed God, thus Judas was picked. Judas’ last name, Iscariot, is another Hebrew word to Greek meaning Ish Cariot, or “man from Cariot.” Cariot was one of the Edomite cities forcefully converted over a century before. Whilst that alone may be circumstantial evidence, it’s significant that Christ Himself called Judas a devil. Therefore, Judas was certainly not an Adamite nor an Israelite, but he was from the race of Cain.
Back to Simon the Apostle. He remained an apostle of Christ and never betrayed Him. In the earliest manuscripts, we find the term “Caananite” and the term “Cananaean.” You can see they are close to each other in spelling. Cana was a city in Galilee, and most of the apostles were from Galilee. Cana was where the wedding of Cana took place and Christ performed His first miracle turning water into wine. In John’s Gospel Chapter 21:2, we see a Nathanael of Cana in Galilee, who is never mentioned in the other Gospels. This is that man of whom Christ had said “Look! An Israelite indeed, in whom there is no guile!” It is therefore certain that these two men were one and the same, Simon Nathanael, the zealot of Cana. He was not a Caananite but Christ himself said he was an Israelite from Cana.
The “Great Commission”
Did Christ tell His apostles to spread His Gospel to every people and nation in the world, or to specific people and nations? In the last passage of the Gospel of Matthew, from Chapter 28:16-20: “Then the eleven disciples went away into Galilee, into a mountain where Jesus had appointed them. And when they saw him, they worshipped him: but some doubted. And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth. Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.”
The original Greek insists it should be “teach all the Nations” not “all Nations.” That one little word (“the”) makes a big difference. If we were in a library and I asked you “pass all the books over to me,” do I mean every single book in the library or am I referring to a stack of specific books? Likewise, Christ is referring to specific nations. These are the many nations that Abraham’s seed would become. Christ did not fully reveal which nations were Israelites at this time. It would primarily be Paul’s commission to find those nations, and he went to Europe and spread Christianity to the Europeans. Later, the other apostles began to realize this, as is evident in their epistles.
Mark Chapter 16:14-18 is not mistranslated but it is misunderstood: “Afterward he appeared unto the eleven as they sat at meat, and upbraided them with their unbelief and hardness of heart, because they believed not them which had seen him after he was risen. And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover.” The phrase “every creature” means Yahweh’s creation. It refers specifically to the Adamic race, which is Yahweh’s creation. Non-Adamics are not His creation. When we realize that, we realize the Gospel is NOT intended for everyone.
The Purpose of the Gospel
In Luke Chapter 1:67-80, Zacharias the father of John the Baptist makes the purpose of Christ’s coming clear: “Then Zacharias his father was filled with the Holy Spirit and prophesied, saying: ‘Blessed is Yahweh the God of Israel, that He has visited and brought about redemption for His people, and has raised a horn of salvation for us in the house of David His servant, just as He spoke through the mouths of His holy prophets from of old: preservation from our enemies and from the hand of all those who hate us! To bring about mercy with our fathers and to call into remembrance His holy covenant, the oath which He swore to Abraham our father, which is given to us: being delivered fearlessly from the hands of our enemies to serve Him in piety and in righteousness before Him for all of our days. And now you, child, shall be called a prophet of the Highest: for you shall go on before the face of Yahweh to prepare His path. For which to give knowledge of salvation to His people by the dismissal of their errors, through the affectionate mercies of our God, by whom dawn visits us from the heights to shine upon those sitting in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet in the way of peace.’ And the child grew and was strengthened in spirit, and was in the wilderness until the day of his manifestation to Israel.” Most Christians who study the Bible will skim over these verses, not realizing their vital importance. Zacharias is stating Christ is coming to save ONLY His Israelites AND that they have enemies.
Luke was a companion of Paul on several of his journeys, and once Paul was arrested, Luke remained with him, evidently for the duration of Paul’s life. He must have had the information concerning the identification of the tribes of Israel and the meanings of the Old Testament prophecies concerning Israel which Paul had been teaching
The Purpose of the Gospel Reiterated
Later, Luke records another statement by the prophet and elder Simeon: “And he (Simeon) came in the Spirit into the temple, and in there being introduced to the parents of the child Yahshua, upon their doing that which is according to the custom of the law concerning Him, then he took Him into his arms and praised Yahweh, and said: ‘Now release Your servant, Master, in peace according to Your word: Because my eyes have seen Your Salvation, which You have prepared in front of all the people: a light for the revelation of the Nations and honor of Your people Israel!’” Simeon had been promised he would live to see Christ. Again this passage is ignored by most Christians, but it clearly states Christ has come to save Israel, not the “Gentiles.”
The Race of Cain
The race of Cain was living in Judea during Christ’s ministry. The majority of the Sadducess and probably the majority of the Pharisees were descendent from Cain. Christ revealed this when He told His adversaries that the race Cain were responsible for killing all the prophets: “The blood of all the prophets spilled from the foundation of the Society should be required from this race” which includes “the blood of Abel unto the blood of Zacharias [John the Baptist’s father].” Cain killed Abel and only Cain can be held accountable for that murder. For Christ to warn that His opponents’ blood would be required for the blood of Abel can mean only one thing: They were the offspring of Cain. If Christ did not mean that, then He was making a false accusation. It is evident through scripture that the race of Cain were guilty for the murder of the prophets. For example, when King Saul ordered the Levites killed, only Doeg the Edomite was willing to do it. Or when Jezebel ordered all the prophets of Yahweh killed, the Canaanite priests went out and killed them. This race literally is responsible for the blood of the prophets.
Christ also said: “Woe to you lawyers! Because you have taken the key of knowledge, you do not enter in yourselves, and you prohibit those who are entering in!” Christ is saying that whilst they cannot enter heaven and cannot do good because of their corrupt origin, they will deceive and corrupt Israelites, turning them away from living righteous lives. Look at our society today and how it has degenerated rapidly in the past few decades now that we are dominated by these people.
The Parable of the Unrighteous Steward
In Luke Chapter 16, Christ used a parable to compare the race of Cain and the the race of Israelites. The Parable of the Unrighteous Steward is really about race, but due to mistranslation, the correct meaning has been obscured. In the parable, an evil steward seizes the kingdom and mismanages it. This unrighteous steward represents the race of Cain which has seized every Adamite nation and corrupted each one. At the end of the parable, Christ contrasts the actions of the two races. Generally, this is translated as “And the lord commended the unjust steward, because he had done wisely: for the children of this world are in their generation wiser than the children of light.” This should be translated as: “And the master praised the unrighteous steward because he did wisely, because the sons of this age are wiser than the sons of light are towards their own race.”
What is the underlying message here? Firstly, that the race of Cain (sons of this age) instinctively understand that they need to band together, put aside grudges and differences, and even make personal sacrifices to help each other. They cooperate. That’s the way they have taken over Adamic Christian nations. Through this tribal loyalty, they have managed, for example, to set up banks in all of our nations and through their control of money, have elevated themselves as absolute masters.
Secondly, Christ’s message is that the Israelite Europeans (sons of light) fail to work together as we should. This is to our detriment and ultimate demise. We squabble amongst ourselves too often. The hidden hand of Cain behind the scenes exploits this weakness to lead us into needless wars against each other. They use propaganda to set us against each other and divide us into different ideologies, political groups, classes and categories to keep us at each others’ throats. Once we are distracted, they work behind the scenes to rule us. This parable teach us the wisdom of cooperating with our own race. Only in this way can we overcome the race of Cain.
Over half of the New Testament is written by the Apostle Paul alone. Paul was crucial in spreading the Gospel to the Europeans, as he not only was incredibly well versed in the law, but also the ancient history of the Greeks and Romans. Upon interacting with them, he frequently quoted their own ancient historians, thus he able to relate to them on a personal level. Furthermore he pieced together their ancient history and origins, understanding how they were descended from the dispersed Israelites. Paul’s Epistles are heavily mistranslated, more mistranslated than any other parts of the Bible. Because Paul identifies the Europeans as the Israelites explicitly and the mistranslations cover this up.
The book of acts start with the Apostles, but transitions to Paul’s ministry. For that reason we will include Acts.
A Crooked Race
Starting In Acts chapter 2, Peter stands up and warns the Israelites: “Save yourselves from this untoward generation.” Once again, this should be race: “You must be saved from this crooked race!” From the time of Herod on wards, Judea was ruled over by Edomites who all had rejected Christ, as they were the race of Cain and therefore were a crooked race. Peter was warning his fellow Israelites to turn to Christ, and to be on guard against this evil race.
The Race of High Priests
Later on in Acts chapter 4, where the high priests were persecuting the apostles of Christ and we read: “5 And there was on the next day a gathering of them, the leaders and the elders and the scribes in Jerusalem, 6 and Hannas the high priest and Kaïaphas and Iohannes and Alexandros and as many as were of the race of the high priest, 7 and standing them in the midst they inquired, ‘By what power or by what name have you done this?’” There at the end of verse 6, the King James Version has “kindred of the high priest.”
This once again this filters down the true meaning. A true translations shows that the apostles were not of the same race as the high priests, and that the high priests were not the countrymen of the apostles. As we’ve explained they were Edomites and despised Christianity. If all of these people were all the same, then there would not be verses contrasting one group of Judeans to another group of Judeans. But Judea did have a mixed population just like all our countries today. There are for example real English, French and German people, then there are people living in our nations who uses those terms but not our race.
Paul’s Commission to Europeans
As we’ve previously explained In Acts 9 it is clear what Paul’s commission by Christ is: “15 But the Prince said to him “’Go! For he is a vessel chosen by Me who is to bear My Name before both the Nations and kings of the sons of Israel.’” Unfortunately once again this is always mistranslated to “the Gentiles, the Kings and the sons of Israel.” As if Paul’s is taking the Gospel to three separate groups when in reality he was going to the Europeans who are the Israelites. Naturally he would first go to those in authority over the European people, which would include the rulers and kings, none the less they were all one and the the same race, the dispersed Israelites.
The Apostles Agreement
As the Book of Acts progresses, the truth of this interpretation is ascertained first where Paul describes the agreement which he and Barnabas had with the other apostles, and we read in Galatians chapter 2, from the King James Version: “9 And when James, Cephas [Peter], and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that was given unto me, they gave to me and Barnabas the right hands of fellowship; that we should go unto the heathen, and they unto the circumcision.” Heathen here should simply be translated as “Nations.”
The incorrect translation implies Paul went to heathen people i.e. making out that the Europeans are heathens and Paul taught them Christianity. Whilst the other Apostles spread to the real Israelites. Paul was commissioned to go to the nations of Israel who were not circumcised, which makes it clear the Europeans were those nations of dispersed Israelites. The Other Apostles spread Christianity locally in Judea and the surrounding regions as well as Babylon where many Judeans had still remained after the Babylonian deportations. This is why in Peter’s Epistle’s he states he is in Babylon.
Paul’s Trial, he only cares for the 12 Tribes
Much later in Acts, when Paul was arrested in Judea and put on trial, in his defense he states: “6 And now I stand and am judged for the hope of the promise made of God unto our fathers: 7 Unto which promise our twelve tribes, instantly serving God day and night, hope to come. For which hope’s sake, king Agrippa, I am accused of the Jews.” The last part should say “I am accused by the Judeans.” The important thing here is that Paul is making a clear distinction between the twelve tribes and the Judeans. As Judea had been subverted by the Edomites and they were in control, they did not want Christianity spreading to the twelve tribes in Europe.
Even later, while addressing the Judeans in Acts chapter 22, Paul had once again recounted the commission which Christ had given to : “21 And he said unto me, Depart: for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles.” So Paul was told by Christ to go to far off nations, and the nations of Europe are the nations of Israel to which he was sent
Then we have the reaction of the Judeans: “22 And they gave him audience unto this word, and then lifted up their voices, and said, Away with such a fellow from the earth: for it is not fit that he should live.” So the only thing Paul said for which the Jews wanted to kill him was that he was commissioned to take the gospel to the twelve tribes of Israel scattered abroad. Why would they care about Europeans far off hearing off Christianity? Why would they be opposed to that? The answer is all around today as we see gradually Christianity being more and more persecuted out of existence in our nations. Because our nations have been subverted by the same devils who wanted Paul executed, the Edomites. They are naturally opposed to Yahweh and all that is good, especially Christianity. They hate moral rule of law and wish to live in a Sodom and Gommorah. More and more this reality is becoming clear as our nations decline. Regardless that is why they did not want Paul spreading Christianity, even to far off people.
Paul and Barnabas turn to the people or Gentiles?
In Acts it seems due to the mistranslation as if Paul after visiting a synagogue in Anatolia he gave up on the Judeans and instead turned to the Gentiles: “46 Then Paul and Barnabas waxed bold, and said, It was necessary that the word of God should first have been spoken to you: but seeing ye put it from you, and judge yourselves unworthy of everlasting life, lo, we turn to the Gentiles.” the last part again should be translated as “behold, we turn to the people!”
This event in Acts chapter 13 happened in Pisidian Antioch, and if Paul gave up on the Jews and said that from this time he would go to gentiles, why is it that he is found in a synagogue in Iconium, speaking to Judaeans, in the very next chapter in Acts 14:1? And he was in a synagogue again in Thessalonica in Acts 17:1, and in Berea in Acts 17:10, and in Athens in Acts 17:17, and in Corinth in Acts 18:1, and in Ephesus in a synagogue for three months in Acts 19:8? The denominational interpretation of this passage is clearly wrong, and therefore the words must have some other meaning by which they can be translated, because Luke is not a liar.
The Judeans, had spread over Europe just like the Israelites had been for over a thousand years prior to Christ. The difference is the dispersed Israelites had forgotten their heritage, whilst the Judeans still understood they were Israelites, primarily either from Judah, Levi or Benjamin. They setup synagogues. Paul would naturally first go to the rulers and authorities of a nation, which included the synagogues.
Paul identifies the Greeks and Romans as Israelites
In Romans 2 we see the extent of how far the mistranslation are willing to go: “9 Tribulation and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew first, and also of the Gentile; 10 But glory, honour, and peace, to every man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and also to the Gentile.” Jew should be Judeans here and as for the term Gentiles it is not even Nations, rather it is Greek. So the mainstream translations are completely dishonest and are inventing things Paul never said. Why does Paul contrast Judeans and Greek?
We see why in Romans 3:9: “What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin…” Again it should be Judeans and Greeks. Since sin is transgression of the law (1 John 3:4) and only Israel was given the law (Psalm 147:19-20) and according to Paul in this very epistle sin is not imputed where there is no law (Romans 5:13) then both Judaeans and Greek must be primarily descended from the ancient Israelites, and that can also be established in history. That is why Paul contrasted them
Paul told the Romans in chapter 1 and 2, that they had the truth of God and changed it into a lie that they had the laws of God written in their hearts, so they must have been descended from Israel, as those things pertained only to Israel, as Paul will also attest later in Romans chapter 9. So the Greeks and Romans were both descended from the Israelites.
Abraham the Forefather of the Europeans
Perhaps what makes it even more clear that the Roman descended from the Israelites, is Paul in Romans 4: “our forefather Abraham has found concerning the flesh?” Here it is clear Romans are descended from Abraham in the flesh. But the King James has father instead: “Abraham our father, as pertaining to the flesh, hath found?” Whilst this is minor, churches generally will claim this means “spiritual father” or some other nonsense. But a forefather is equivalent to an ancestor and Paul even adds the term “in the flesh” meaning Abraham was literally the ancestor of the Romans.
Romans Adopted or the Heir?
Then there are few verses which seem to indicate the Romans could be adopted by Yahweh. Which could be twisted to imply they are Gentiles and if they believe in Christ will be accepted and become Christians such as Romans 8:15: “15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father.”
In reality the word translated as adoption does not mean adoption but rather a designation of heir, which generally was an already existing close family member. If for example you have ten sons, you might pick a particular son to your inheritance. Or if you have a son but have a fall out, then years later reconcile, that son once more may enjoy the status of your heir. What Paul is saying is, the Romans already were Israelites and if they came back to Yahweh, i.e became Christian they would regain the natural position of Yahweh’s heir and people like their ancestors once had. All Adamites are the sons of Yahweh, but only the children of Israel were chosen as His heir. If we choose Christ we Israelite regain that position.
Paul only cares about fellow Israelites
“For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh: 4 Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises; 5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.”
Later in that same chapter, Paul insisted that “the children of the promise are counted for the seed.” Upon saying that, he described the promise made to Sara, and then the promise made to Rebecca concerning their children. So believers are not the “seed” of the promise, but only the descendants of those women, ultimately though Jacob Israel.
The Gentiles or Abrahamic Nations?
Romans 15:9 to 11: First to quote the King James Version rendering of this passage: “9 And that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy; as it is written, For this cause I will confess to thee among the Gentiles, and sing unto thy name. 10 And again he saith, Rejoice, ye Gentiles, with his people. 11 And again, Praise the Lord, all ye Gentiles; and laud him, all ye people.”
In verse 9 there is a paraphrase of 2 Samuel 22:50 and Psalm 18:49. In the places where the King James Version has “Gentiles” here, the word is “heathen” in the King James Version in those corresponding Old Testament verses. Verses 10 and 11 quote Deuteronomy 32:43 and Psalm 117:1 respectively. In those places in the King James Version where it reads “nations,” the King James Version has “Gentiles” here in Romans. So they apparently could not translate the words which mean nations, whether Hebrew or Greek, with any consistency whatsoever.
Satan to be bruised shortly?
Finally Paul makes a clear prediction of the bruising of Satan. This is Christs prophecy of the destruction of Jerusalem which happened a few years after Paul wrote this Epistle. This clearly shows Satan is not some spiritual boogeyman, but a race of people who’s power base at the time was controlling Judea. With the destruction they were dispersed and had to rebuild their power base.
Romans 16:20: Now we should probably discuss Romans 16:20, which reads in the King James Version: “20 And the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you. Amen.”
All Christians are Saints
In Corinthians and most of Paul’s Epistles he frequently opened by greeting the saints, by this Paul simply was greeting all Christians. Most translations add “to be” in front of saints, to make out that perhaps later in time they would become saints. This is the church misteaching that the Pope or whomever alone had the power and authority to make people saints. The mistranslations are trying to uphold his skewed view. Only Yahweh can make someone a saint and as we’ve explained all Israelites are saints if they become Christians.
Paul the steward of a Family
Later on Paul states that he was given the stewardship of a household to spread Christianity: “I had been entrusted with the management of a family.” the King James changes the translation to: “a dispensation of the gospel is committed unto me.” Here the context is lost, it as if Paul is merely spreading the Gospel, but with the accurate translation we see his mission is to a particular family, that Christ chose him to find His people the Israelites and specifically teach them alone the gospel.
Separate from Untrustworthy Aliens
Paul warns Israelites not to interact with other races, once again the translation is skewed in 2 Corinthians 6:14, “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers.” However it should be: “Do not become yoked together with untrustworthy aliens.” Here we see Paul considered non-Adamics to be untrustworthy as well. Earlier on Paul in chapter 7 advised men and women already married to unbelievers to continue in marriage, and so the mistranslation would make Paul out to be a liar and contradicting himself.
Come out from amongst the Impure
Paul reiterates this in 2 Corinthians 6:17: “Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you.” The translations add thing “the unclean thing.” It should be: “do not be joined to the impure.” Here Paul is talking about people not physical objects, again advising us we must separate form non-Adamics. He is quoting Isaiah, the translations once again added “thing” in Isaiah 52:11: “Depart ye, depart ye, go ye out from thence, touch no unclean thing; go ye out of the midst of her; be ye clean, that bear the vessels of the LORD.” Yahweh was commanding the Israelites to separate from other non-Adamic races, so here is proof again that Paul considered the Corinthians to be Israelites, repeating the same command their ancestors had been given.
There is no Faith in Bastards
2 Corinthians 13:5: “5 Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?”
“5 you yourselves must make trial, whether you are in the faith. You must examine yourselves. Truly, do you not yourselves observe that Yahshua Christ is among you, unless somehow you are spurious?”
Hebrews chapter 12 where Paul wrote “But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons.”
Abrahamic Nations to be Blessed
3:6 “6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 7 Know ye therefore that they which are of faith, the same are the children of Abraham. 8 And the scripture, foreseeing that God would justify the heathen through faith, preached before the gospel unto Abraham, saying, In thee shall all nations be blessed.”
6 Just as ‘Abraham had trusted Yahweh, and it was accounted to him for righteousness’ 7 then you know that they from faith [meaning the faith which Abraham had], they are sons of Abraham. 8 And the writing having foreseen that from faith [that same faith of Abraham] Yahweh would deem the Nations righteous, announced to Abraham beforehand that ‘In you shall all the Nations be blessed.”
Israelites the Anointed Race
The following verse is one of those favorites universalist’s love to bring up, it is Galatians 3:16: “Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.” At the end it implies that the seed of Abraham is “which is Christ,” as if all the promises made to Abraham were actually in Christ’s coming, that everyone who becomes Christians is fulfilling this promise. However the last part is mistranslated and should be “‘and to your offspring,’ which are anointed.” The Israelites are Abraham’s offspring or seed and they are the anointed, the mistranslations turn it into Christ. Therefore all the promises are fulfilled in the Israelites.
The Europeans are one race
Another old favorite is Galatians 3:28: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.” This is quoted to suggest all races are together in Christ if they believe in Christ. However it should be “Judean or Greek” and Paul stated in Romans he only cares about “Israelites according to the flesh,” why would he suddenly change and become a universalist. What Paul really means is that the scattered Israelites of the captivity, those who were once under the law, were found among the Greeks just as there were Israelites in Judaea, and whether bond or free, male or female, since they were all Israelites they were all equal in the eyes of God. But what Paul did not mean is to admit other races, who were never under the law and who had no part in the promises.
Only Abraham’s Seed are Christians
Finally one last favorite of universalists, Galatians 3:29: “But if you are Christ’s, then of the offspring of Abraham you are heirs according to promise.” However in the original Greek this is a conditional sentence, meaning if one part is true then the other part must be true as well. In other words only Abraham’s heirs according to the promise are Christ’s and only Christ’s are Abraham seed according to the promise. Only Israelites can become Christians, and Christians are only Israelites. Paul meant if people at that time accepted Christianity, when Christianity was small and being persecuted, then they must be Israelites as tares would never accept it.
Israel to be Restored to Position of Son
Then to conclude Galatians we have once again a mistranslation to adoption, Galatians 4:5: “that we might receive the adoption of sons.” This should be: “that we would recover the position of sons.”
Predestiny of Europeans
In Ephesians it seems once again that Christ is adopting the Gentiles: “4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love: 5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will, 6 To the praise of the glory of his grace, wherein he hath made us accepted in the beloved. 7 In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace.”
It should be: “Just as He has chosen us, with Him before the foundation of the Society, for us to be holy and blameless before Him. With love 5 having preordained us into the position of sons through Yahshua Christ for Himself, in accordance with the satisfaction of His will, 6 for the praise of the honor of His favor, of which He has favored us among the beloved. 7 In whom we have redemption through His blood, the dismissal of transgressions in accordance with the riches of His favor.” The Israelites who became Christian were predestined to reclaim the position of heir to Yahweh. The forgiveness of sins can only be those under the law, so again this can only refer to Israelites.
Gentiles in the Flesh?
The next one is quite extraordinary Ephesians 2:11: “11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands; 12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world: 13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.” If Gentiles means “non-Jew” were we all “non-Jews” but become Jews if we accept Christianity?
A better translation: “11 On which account you must remember that at one time you, the Nations in the flesh, who are the so-called ‘uncircumcised’ by the so-called ‘circumcised’ made by hand in the flesh, 12 because you had at that time been apart from Christ, having been alienated from the civic life of Israel, and strangers of the covenants of the promise, not having hope and in the Society without Yahweh…” The Israelites dispersed to Europe, over the generations they quickly gave up the circumcision. They were considered the “uncircumcised.” They were doomed to be wiped out, as Yahweh was obligated to destroy an unfaithful wife. However by Christ, the husband dieing, he released them from this fate. With Europeans accepting Christ, they are reconciled to their husband and therefore had hope.
“1 For this cause I Paul, the prisoner of Jesus Christ for you Gentiles, 2 If ye have heard of the dispensation of the grace of God which is given me to you-ward: 3 How that by revelation he made known unto me the mystery; (as I wrote afore in few words, 4 Whereby, when ye read, ye may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ) 5 Which in other ages was not made known unto the sons of men, as it is now revealed unto his holy apostles and prophets by the Spirit; 6 That the Gentiles should be fellow heirs, and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel: 7 Whereof I was made a minister, according to the gift of the grace of God given unto me by the effectual working of his power. 8 Unto me, who am less than the least of all saints, is this grace given, that I should preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ; 9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ.”
“1 For this cause I, Paul, captive of Christ Yahshua on behalf of you of the Nations, 2 if indeed you have heard of the management of the family of the favor of Yahweh which has been given to me in regard to you, 3 seeing that by a revelation the mystery was made known to me (just as I had briefly written before, 4 besides which reading you are able to perceive my understanding in the mystery of the Anointed,) 5 which in other generations had not been made known to the sons of men, as it is now revealed in His holy ambassadors and prophets by the Spirit, 6 those Nations which are joint heirs and a joint body and partners of the promise in Christ Yahshua, through the good message 7 of which I have become a servant in accordance with the gift of the favor of Yahweh which has been given to me, in accordance with the operation of His power. 8 To me, the least of all saints, has been given this favor, to announce the good message to the Nations – the unsearchable riches of the Anointed, 9 and to enlighten all concerning the management of the household of the mystery which was concealed from the ages by Yahweh, by whom all things are being established.”
A Crooked and Perverse Race
In Philippians 2:14-16, Paul warns Christians to on guard: “That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world.” However the true translation is far more explicit: “That you would be perfect and with unmixed blood, blameless children of Yahweh in the midst of a race crooked and perverted – among whom you appear as luminaries in the cosmos” Once again we see Paul’s warning not merely unbelievers, but a crooked race surrounding the Christians. If Paul warns Christians to keep their blood unmixed, then this crooked race must be mixed, in other words they are devils and bastards.
Every Creature under Heaven
In Colossians 1:23, it seems Paul is making a universalist statement: “If ye continue in the faith grounded and settled, and be not moved away from the hope of the gospel, which ye have heard, and which was preached to every creature which is under heaven; whereof I Paul am made a minister.” The Gospel of Christ is not for all creatures, it is only meant for a specific creation, the Adamic creation which survived in the children of Israel. Abraham was promised that his seed would inherit the nations, and they did. Paul means Christianity must go to all Israelites, they are every creature.
Their own Prophets or The Prophets?
In Thessalonians Paul seems to imply the Judaeans killed Christ and their own prophets, implying they are the Israelites: 2:14: “…Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men….” Were it says “their own prophets,” this does not exist in the manuscripts until at least the 7th century revisions. Older manuscripts have “the prophets.” The people who killed Christ, killed “the prophets” NOT “their own prophets.”
They are not the same race as the Israelites. As we’ve explained earlier, Doeg the Edomite and Jezebel with her Canaanite priests were responsible for killing the prophets in the Old Testament. Likewise their future descendants, the race of Cain were in Judea at the time of Christ and they are responsible for his death. The prophets of the Old Testament are not their kin.
Identifying the Anti-Christ
Next is probably the worst mistranslation in all of Paul’s Epistles, from 2 Thessalonians chapter 2: “3 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; 4 Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. 5 Remember ye not, that, when I was yet with you, I told you these things? 6 And now ye know what withholdeth that he might be revealed in his time. 7 For the mystery of iniquity doth already work: only he who now letteth will let, until he be taken out of the way. 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:”
This passage has always been used to promote the concept that the antichrist, or an antichrist, would come at some point far in the future, while in truth the Satan which Paul had described is the Edomites who has been present here all along. The problem is in the Greek the tenses are in the present but the mistranslations make it future tense as if Paul is making a prophecy far off into the future.
A more accurate translation: “You should not be deceived by anyone, in any way, because if apostasy had not come first, and the man of lawlessness been revealed; the son of destruction, 4 he who is opposing and exalting himself above everything said to be a god or an object of worship, and so he is seated in the temple of Yahweh, representing himself that he is a god. 5 Do you not remember that, yet being with you I had told these things to you? 6 And you know that which now prevails, for him to be revealed in his own time. 7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already operating, he prevailing only presently, until he should be out of the way, 8 and then will the lawless be revealed, whom Prince Yahshua will destroy with the breath of His mouth, and abolish at the manifestation of His presence.”
The High-Priest originally was solely a descendant of Aaron. With the Edomites under King Herod usurping Judea, from that time forward the High-Priest were Edomites. The Edomite High-Priest was sitting in the temple of Yahweh during Paul’s lifetime. He is the man of lawlessness Paul is referring to, how ever he also more broadly refers to the Edomites as a while as the son of destruction. Yahweh has prophesied in Obadiah he is going to destroy them all. There destiny is already seat and it is a meeting with the lake of fire.
Christianity is Not for all
In 1 Thessalonians 3:2, Paul makes it clear Christianity is not universalist: “for all men have not faith.” This translation is absolutely untenable, and purposely dishonest. It should say: “the faith is not for all.” The mistranslation implies you have believers and non-believers. The accurate translation makes it clear Christianity is not intended for everyone. Christ never tried to convert his adversaries, he simply told them “they would die in their sins.” Paul here had the same mindset.
Purely Bred Israelites
Finally in Paul’s personal epistles to Timothy and Titus, he makes it clear they are pure-bred Israelites by race but the translations are twisted. Firstly Timothy: “2 Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord.” Instead of “my own son in the faith” it should be “purely bred child in faith.” Paul was not adopting Timothy, rather because Timothy’s father was a Greek, but his mother a Judaean. He especially may have been considered a bastard by both the Judaeans and by the Greeks. Therefore Paul was assuring him he was a pure Israelite. Paul understood that the majority of the Europeans were descended from the Israelites and as Timothy had proven himself in the faith, he knew he must be an Israelite. As Christ said “by their fruits, you will know them.”
Likewise in Titus: “To Titus, mine own son after the common faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ our Saviour.” Instead of “mine own son” it should be “a purely bred child.” Titus was a Greek, but again Paul knew many of the Greeks were Israelites. This has nothing to do with belief, but everything to do with race. Paul was assuring both Titus and Timothy of their legitimacy as Israelites, and therefore of their respective shares in the covenants which were made exclusively with Israel.
Overall in Paul’s Epistles with correct translations, all universalism falls apart immediately. It becomes clear the Europeans are the Israelites and Paul believed that. Christianity is solely intended for Europeans, to reconcile them with Yahweh. By Europeans becoming Christian they regain their position of heirs of Yahweh and their share in all the promises made to their Israelite forefathers. This was Paul’s mission, something he dedicated his life to and by and large thanks to him our nations became Christian.
When Peter wrote his Epistles at least 30 years had passed since Christ’s resurrection, thus this a much wiser and experienced Peter who now fully realized the Europeans are the Israelites, that the Gospel must be taken to them. Thanks to Paul many churches had been founded across Europe and here Peter is predominately writing to those Churches. It is likely that Paul had already been executed by this stage, so Peter is offering support and fully backing Paul’s ministries.
Peter opened his first epistle with the following salutation: “Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, to the strangers scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia….” All these places named were within Anatolia, which predominantly was inhabited by Greeks, Romans and Gauls. With this translation, by saying “strangers” it seems to imply the false narrative that these people are merely “Gentiles” to Peter and he is spreading Christianity to them.
However a better translation would be “sojourners,” they were Israelites who had been scattered to those parts. In the Genesis 10 dispersion of the Adamic nation, originally Anatolia belonged to Lud, the Lydians. Thus it was not the Israelites original land and that is why Peter refers to them as sojourners. What is crucial as well is that most translations completely ignore and leave out a word, it should actually be “elect sojourners.” Only the Israelites are the elect, they anointed chosen people of Yahweh. Thus here it immediately becomes clear that Peter is speaking to Israelites. No wonder the translators try to hide that word.
Next Peter identifies those people are Israelites but again it is mistranslated: “But ye are a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, an holy nation, a peculiar people; that ye should shew forth the praises of him who hath called you out of darkness into his marvellous light.” This should be “a chosen race,” not a “generation.” Peter is repeating the same words Moses was told by Yahweh to tell the children of Israel in Exodus, therefore Peter is telling those people they are the Israelites and are one race or one family descended from Jacob. As Yahweh told the Israelites: “Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you,” and “I have chosen you out of the world.” There are no other chosen people in the world, he didn’t choose the Israelites only later to choose everybody.
Next Peter addresses the woman the assemblies, Peter 3:6: “Even as Sara obeyed Abraham, calling him lord: whose daughters ye are, as long as ye do well, and are not afraid with any amazement.” Here the translators added “as long as ye do well.” They completely dishonestly add in their own words to change the meaning, making it sound like believers becomes daughters of Sarah. However Peter was talking to the woman in the Christian assemblies acknowledging that they were descended from Sarah and thus like Sarah are born to do good and like Sarah should obey their husbands. That is the message here.
In Peter’s second Epistle he explains that there are Nephilim still out there, however the translation filters down Peter’s explicit message: “But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption.” a more honest translations would be: “But these, having been born as natural irrational animals into destruction and corruption in which blaspheming they are ignorant in their corruption they also shall perish.” Here we see there are people born in this world, who Peters labels as animals who are born into destruction, unaware of their origin or their destined fate. He is speaking of the offspring of Fallen Angels, who do not posses the spirit of Yahweh which was breathed in Adam, therefore ultimately they will not experience eternal life. It is exactly what Christ taught when he divides the nations, the “sheep and the goats.” The mistranslations tries to hide they are born, this way it can be argued that it is believers and non believers, rather than Adamites and non-Adamites who are born the way they are.
Peter then describes that certain of these men as being: “Spots… and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you.” These are the descendants of Cain and Nephilim who have intermixed enough with Adamites that there appearance is close enough to us that they can infiltrate our society and “feast with you” He continues: “Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children.” They always try to corrupt our societies, just look around us. Our nations are gradually being turned into Sodom and Gommorah. As Christ explained “by their fruits you will know them.” Peter is warning of these infiltrators, the only way to weed them out is by having a moral Christian civilization which naturally expose them.
Overall Peter acknowledges all the Christians as Israelites, that they have been restored to their position under Yahweh. He warns of the infiltrators they must be on guard for, unfortunately our people did not heed this lesson. Because these people Peter tried to warn us about have subverted our nations and now are in control.
The Apostles James is the same James whom Paul referred to as “the brother of the Lord,” as he was also a son of Mary. Today, we’d call him a half-brother. He had remained in Jerusalem where he wrote to the Israelites scattered abroad in Europe. This is immediately obvious in the opening of his epistle which he addressed to the “twelve tribes in the dispersion.” Obviously, the Israelites did not vanish into thin air and become the “Lost Tribes.” They were never lost. They went to Europe and James, as well as the other apostles, knew where they were.
With this in mind, we should read James 1:23-24, first from the King James Version: “For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass: For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was.” A more accurate translation gives us a different meaning: “Because if one is a hearer of the Word and not a doer, he is like a man observing the appearance of his race in a mirror, for he observes himself and departs and immediately forgets of what sort he was.”
James is saying that a man may be Adamic and an Israelite, born in the image and likeness of Yahweh God, but this is not enough by itself. Unless he is also a “doer of His Word,” he is not performing according to the intention of his Creator. To put it simply, if a man does NOT follow Christ after hearing the Gospel, he is ignoring the race he sees in the mirror. In other words, he may as well be of some other race.
By using the phrase “appearance of his race” coupled with the expectation to be a “doer of the Word” depending on what reflection you see, James shows that other races are not expected to follow Christ or obey His law. Not every race was born in Yahweh’s image and likeness. For that reason, race does matter. If we combine James’ epistle with Christ’s teachings and the other apostles, it’s all consistent. The reflection of race in the mirror must be the European race because Christianity is intended only for us. Only we Europeans are expected to be doers of the word. Christ summarized what we need to do in two simple commandments: “Love Yahweh your God” and “love thy neighbor as thyself.” Neighbor means our own people, and to be doers of the Word, we need to love our neighbors as ourselves.
As the Apostles spread Christianity, their epistles recorded the difficulties they faced and warned about infiltrators who tried to undermine their work. These infiltrators would join the Christian assemblies under false pretenses. They introduced heresies to divide, corrupt, and pervert Christianity. But who were they? When the mistranslations in Peter’s epistles are corrected, we see these infiltrators were not ordinary men. Peter linked them to Sodom and Gomorrah as well as to Cain and the Fallen Angels. This means they were an evil race. They were the physical offspring of Cain and the Fallen Angels. They created Sodom and its perversions. Because their genetic nature and race were evil, they always worked (and still work today) to corrupt and destroy Christianity. Genetically they were incapable of accepting the truth and were always destined for the lake of fire.
The entire Second Epistle of Peter Chapter 2 warns of these false prophets: “But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.” Peter warns Christian to be on guard for false prophets.
Then he explains their origin: “And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.” Here Peter states that these infiltrators had been condemned from ages past. Only the Nephilim — because they were corruptions of Yahweh’s Adamic creation — had been condemned in this manner. Thus we can ascertain that these infiltrating false prophets were not mere Adamic men. In Scripture, the Israelites were promised chastisement but also mercy and eternal life; they were never condemned.
Peter instructs us how to identify the infiltrators: they do not acknowledge the Word of God but instead teach another gospel and introduce heresies. They come from the camp of the enemy. But we must be careful to understand that Peter is talking about the deceivers, and not merely the deceived. We have European pastors today in denominational churches who are teaching the heresies privily introduced by Converso’s, and their followers. We have around two thousand years of converts to Christianity who have corrupted Christianity. Therefore, Scripture is no longer taught accurately and neither is it translated properly according to the actual meanings of the words. Virtually all Christians today have been deceived, and Christians in authority are unwittingly teaching many deceptions to their followers.
Next, Peter explains how the Fallen Angels had been condemned: “For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment; And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly.” It should be noted that “into chains of darkness” can be interpreted two ways: literally as the Fallen Angels are bound somewhere in chains in a dark pit, or that their physical offspring are bound in bodies which are allegorically “chains of darkness.” They are trapped because they are destined for the lake of fire with no way out. Either would be a valid interpretation.
Peter links the Fallen Angels and their offspring to Sodom: “And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an example unto those that after should live ungodly; And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds.)” The city Sodom was within the lands of Canaan and the Canaanites had intermingled with the Kennites and Nephilim. From this history, we see that due to their corrupt genetics, their natural inclination was to create Sodom. They could not do otherwise. In our time, they are attempting to transform all of our formerly Christian nations into Sodom and Gomorrah.
Peter then states that Adamites can escape temptations by following the spirit of Yahweh, but non-Adamics are reserved for destruction: “The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished.”
He describes how non-Adamics behaved in his time: “But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, self-willed, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities. Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.” These men had no fear of God or godly authority, and while they were not as powerful as the angels, not even the angels found it necessary to accuse them before God. Why might that be? Ostensibly because they had already been condemned from of old. The enemies of God, as we can observe in our modern world, blaspheme everything good and noble and honorable, and seek to create their own sick perverted version of Creation.
Peter likened them to beasts: “But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption.” In Genesis, everything Yahweh God made was declared to be good, and nothing He made was “born to be taken and destroyed,” as Peter says of these men here. This is because Yahweh did not make these men, just as He did not make the mixed races and the children of the Watchers, as the mixed-race bastards are called in Enoch.
Bastards cannot stop sinning: “And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the daytime. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you; Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children.” The bastards may be deceived or deceive themselves into thinking that they can be Christians. But they are merely spots in the Christian feasts. They are cursed children, and in Scripture, the children of the bastards, of Cain, Canaan, and Esau were all cursed.
Interestingly, Peter shows that they teach liberal Christianity: “For when they speak great swelling words of vanity, they allure through the lusts of the flesh, through much wantonness, those that were clean escaped from them who live in error. While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.” To be Christian is to obey Christ’s commandments, which are Yahweh’s laws. There is no way around this. The liberty offered by those who would corrupt the Gospel is actually not liberty, but licentiousness, by which men become servants of corruption.
Finally, Peter says that these pretenders always return to their old ways: “For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning. For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.”
Thus we learn from Peter that even if these infiltrators masquerade as Christians and seem to follow the Gospel, at least for a time, ultimately their true nature will always reveal itself. Eventually, they return to the sins of the world or they attempt to justify those sins in the name of Christ or of God. Just like a pigs, regardless of how you clean them up and train them, they cannot be sheep. They naturally enjoy rolling in their filth. They cannot help themselves. Likewise these infiltrators, it is not in their nature, or their race, to do good. Peter is warning us about this race of men whose nature it is to do evil. These men have no hope in Christ and naturally despise him and Christianity because they are inherently and naturally evil.
Jude’s Epistle goes into even more detail than Peter’s describing the links between the Fallen Angels, Cain and the infiltrators operating in his day. Those who called themselves Israel but were not truly Israel and who’s existence was condemned from of old. It should be noted that all Epistles from the Apostles had their enemies early on in Christianity and they almost did not make it into our Bibles. As Christianity was legitimated by Constantine within the Roman Empire in the early 4th century, some of the supposed Christians who became authorities within the Empire, clearly were not happy with the Apostle’s Epistles.
On the contrary, earlier Christian writers, before Christianity was legitimized such as Irenaeus, Polycarp, Tertullian, Hippolytus, Novatian and others cited and quoted from the Epistles. They accepted their veracity and had no problems what so ever with them. However the powers that be within the Roman Empire had a different perspective. Their version of Christianity was a Universal one, where anyone could be Christian. They favored stability of the Empire over the dividing racial message of true Christianity. The early resistance to the Epistles is likely therefore due to the many references to Fallen Angels and people who have a doomed existence because of their origin. Fortunately despite the Epistles enemies, the Epistles survived and made it into our Bible and we can learn a great deal about race from them.
In the opening verse of his Jude, he addresses it to “those beloved by God the Father” and also to “them that are sanctified by God.” Whilst modern Christians have been duped into believing this refers to the “Gentiles,” in reality Jude is referring specifically to the Israelites. Only they were chosen by Yahweh and only they were sanctified. Later Jude mentions “the common salvation,” which is a reference to all Israelites being saved by Christ and not all believers.
Now Jude like Peter warns of the infiltrators: “4 For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.” Once again only the Nephilim were condemned to destruction, but importantly where Jude tells us they deny Yahweh and deny Christ this must mean men pretending to be Israelites but then denying the Bible or not obeying the commandments. As we’ve previously explained, Pagans across the Greco-Roman world would not be considered infiltrators.
Next Jude just like Peter goes on and associates these false teachers with the godless men of old, who were “of old ordained to this condemnation.” once again these can only be Nephilim, the devils walking around at the time of the apostles and still are today. Likewise Paul associates the deception of Christians with that Serpent of old, at 2 Corinthians 11:3: “But I fear lest in any way, as the serpent had thoroughly beguiled Eve in his villainy, your thoughts would be corrupted from that sincerity and that purity which is with the Anointed.”
Now Jude offers a warning of temporal destruction to those who would reject Christ and His teachings: “5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.” Where he says “though ye once knew this” he means the Europeans ancestors were in the Exodus and once knew to obey Yahweh, in other words the Europeans are Israelites.
Next it becomes clear Jude is quoting the book of Enoch and confirms that the Fallen Angels did fall from heaven, from the grace of Yahweh: “6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day.” They await an eternal punishment. There are two ways to interpret “in everlasting chains under darkness.” Either the Fallen Angels are bound in a dark pit somewhere, or it is referring to their offspring who are trapped in bodies, they are evil and therefore in darkness and can not escape their fate of destruction on the great day of Christ’s return.
There are numerous verses In 1 Enoch which Jude could be referring to. One of those is in chapter 12, where we see that Enoch himself is addressed in a command, evidently in the prelude to the flood of Noah: “4 ‘Enoch, thou scribe of righteousness, go, declare to the Watchers of the heaven who have left the high heaven, the holy eternal place, and have defiled themselves with women, and have done as the children of earth do, and have taken unto themselves wives: ‘Ye have wrought great destruction on the earth.’” There are many other portions of 1 Enoch which also offer relevant citations.
Now Jude elaborates further than Peter, linking these infiltrators to Sodom and also what the true primary sin of Sodom actually was: “7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.” The word for strange is ἕτερος (heteros), which means different. Eve was created from the flesh of Adam, thus as Adam stated she was “the bone of my bone, the flesh of my flesh.” All of Adam and Eve’s descendants would therefore be the same flesh as each other. No Adamite could ever be considered “strange flesh.” So what is Jude saying?
If Jude links fornication to “going after strange flesh,” it can only be Adamites mixing with Nephilim who are not from Adam, but part Fallen Angel, part Beast and part Adamite. Therefore Nephilim are strange or different flesh from Adamites. This again also confirms Nephilim survived the flood. The primary sin of Sodom was race-mixing, but of course the resulting offspring of these unholy unions would naturally be perverted and be inclined to all other sins including sodomy, which the city primarily got it’s name from.
The book of Tobit, is another book which deserves a mention. Tobit was an Israelite of the Assyrian captivity, who was living in Nineveh. Tobit tells us not only not to commit fornication, but that when one does so, he hates his own people in 4:12-13: “Beware of all whoredom, my son, and chiefly take a wife of the seed of thy fathers, and take not a strange woman to wife, which is not of thy father’s tribe: for we are the children of the prophets, Noe, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: remember, my son, that our fathers from the beginning, even that they all married wives of their own kindred, and were blessed in their children, and their seed shall inherit the land. Now therefore, my son, love thy brethren, and despise not in thy heart thy brethren, the sons and daughters of thy people, in not taking a wife of them: for in pride is destruction and much trouble, and in lewdness is decay and great want: for lewdness is the mother of famine.” At the start, the word for whoredom is that same Greek word, πορνεία (porneia), which the King James Version often rendered as fornication and is also the source of where we get the English word pornography from. The lesson through out the Bible is that just like Cain killed Abel, bastards produced through fornication, will always strive to destroy us Adamites. Therefore Tobit tells us not only not to commit fornication, and explains that when one does so, he hates his own people.
Back to Jude he continues and like Peters likens these men to beasts “8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities…. 10 But these indeed blaspheme whatever they do not know, yet whatever is natural they understand like irrational beasts, by these things they destroy themselves.” So there mind is filth, they hate authority i.e. Yahweh’s commandments, they see it as a prison.
So overall we see that Jude like Peter continuously warn of these doomed men, these Nephilim who infiltrate our Christian civilization and gradually try to corrupt and erode it. Today they largely succeeded and boasts that is now post Europe. Interestingly although the Apostles Epistles remained in the Bible the book of Enoch was removed. Understanding it has all the references to the bastards from the Watchers, aka Nephilim from Fallen Angels who await their destruction upon Christ’s return, we can certainly see why this book was removed.
Today many Christians are deceived by conspiracy theories about a so-called anti-Christ who will be born in the end times. He will rule the world. Some hold that he will be born of Satan. All these theories are nothing but deflections. They distract Christians from the real anti-Christ. In fact, there is more than one anti-Christ. There’s a whole race of them and the Bible collectively calls them the anti-Christ. They are not a threat in some distant future; they are destroying us right now. The Apostle John makes it clear anti-Christs (plural) are born and were being born in his day nearly 2000 years ago. These people have continuously opposed Christ since the beginning of His ministry. Since then, they have striven to corrupt Christianity. Ultimately, they want to destroy Christianity and Christians. They are the real anti-Christs. The misconceptions around the “anti-Christ” are due to poor translations in John’s Epistles.
In John’s first Epistle Chapter 2 verse 18, he says many anti-Christs had already been BORN during his time: “Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists.” The translators purposely ignored that the phrase “even now are there many antichrists” should be “even now many antichrists have been born.” There is an enormous difference between people born antichrists and people who may become antichrists due to their actions and choices later in life. Christ Himself told His adversaries: “But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you.” There Christ clearly informed His adversaries that they could not believe in Him because they were not His people. They were anti-Christs because they were not His sheep genetically and never could be. Because of their race, they would by nature always be opposed to Him and His message. Simply put, they were and are born that way.
Continuing, John explains that the anti-Christs seemed to be Israelites but really weren’t: “They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.” The Edomites were intermixed with the real Israelites. Both groups were simply seen as Judeans. Thus the anti-Christs appeared to originate from the Israelites or more specifically, from the population of Judea. Christ’s gospel is the key to telling them apart, the wheat from the tares. Bastards can never accept Christ. They cannot live a moral life and obey His commandments. Genetically, they naturally hate and despise God’s commandments and morality. They will always choose to live a sinful life.
This is exactly the point Paul was making in Romans when he said he only prayed for his own brethren, his “kinsmen according to the flesh… who are Israelites.” Then later he contrasted the two groups, real Israelites and non-Israelites to those of Jacob as “vessels of mercy” and those of Esau as “vessels of destruction.” In other words, Paul more specifically links the anti-Christs to being Edomites, and as we will see John more generally links them to the race of Cain. Both are correct.
John defines an anti-Christ: “Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father.” Whilst Rome and its empire were pagan, the people in the Roman Empire were unaware of the history of Israel, the laws of Moses, and the Messianic prophecies. Therefore, we cannot label them anti-Christs. Indeed, the Roman Empire eventually converted to Christianity. On the contrary, the Edomites in Judea had been raised under the law for at least one hundred and fifty years since they were forcefully converted. They fully understood who Christ was, but they still rejected him. This identifies them as anti-Christs. It can only be their genetics because they were the race of Cain. They were bastards. They never accepted Christ when He was on earth nor in the 2000 years since then. Of course, there have been fake conversions now and then but that was only to corrupt Christianity from within.
John then states that the authors of sin are the anti-Christs collectively, whom he also refers to as the devil. But this is lost in the translation. 1 John 3:7-8: “Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous. He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth from the beginning. For this purpose, the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil.” Where it says “He that committeth sin is of the devil,” the Greek word translated as “committeth” means “to create” or “to be the author.” John is saying that these devils, these anti-Christs roaming around our nations, create sin and all manners of temptations to cause us to fall. Just like their father the Fallen Angel did in the Garden of Eden when he tempted Eve into sin and produced Cain and his evil race.
Next, John explains that if we Israelites marry Adamites and produce Adamite children, we cannot sin: 1 John 3:9: “Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.” This may seem confusing, but it means that Christ has wiped out the sins of the Israelites and also the wider Adamic race. Therefore, in heaven, we will be cleansed and sinless. If however, you marry a non-Adamite, your offspring will be a different seed and not the same seed as you, the parent. So your seed would not “remaineth in him.” Your offspring will not be cleansed by Christ and so will be destroyed. This is what this passage means. Of course, we should strive to live moral lives. John is not inviting us to sin. Rather, he is warning us not to race-mix but to stay on the “tree of life.”
Finally, we get another proof that Cain was not from Adam. He was not an Adamite but a bastard, a corruption from a Fallen Angel: “Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother. And wherefore slew he him? Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.” John mentions Cain because he is linking the race of anti-Christs back to their forefather Cain.
Now that we have a clear translation of John’s Epistles, it’s obvious that there were infiltrators in Judea from the race of Cain. These infiltrators claimed to be Israelites but were not. The only way to tell Israelites and infiltrators apart is with Christ’s Gospel. Non-Israelites will always reject it. Because they are bastards, it is their nature to reject Christ. They do not have the spirit of Yahweh in them; therefore, they have no part with God, with Christ, who dwells only within us.