In today’s world, it’s generally assumed as fact that the populations of the Middle East and North Africa have always been what they are now. In other words, that the people living in these areas have always looked like they do today. For example, the Egyptians have always looked like the current population of Egyptians throughout all time. For the most part, this continuity of peoples is assumed and taught regarding all places in the world. It’s taken for granted that the demographics of nations and places have never radically changed and that the DNA of the current populations is the same as those who founded those nations. However, this is a complete lie and an absurdity.
Let’s examine why. Firstly, as we’ve shown in earlier Proofs, it’s easily demonstrated that long ago the European people migrated out of the Middle East and moved into Europe en masse. This is a historical fact, although it’s usually buried and hidden. Clearly, if the Europeans originated in the Middle East, then logically at one point the demographics of the Middle East were different than they are today. America is another example. People tend to assume that the United States was always a mixed-raced nation, as it is today. But it wasn’t. Originally, America was a country of white Europeans, founded for white Europeans and their progeny. But that is conveniently forgotten now. Or if it is recalled, it is derided and condemned.
Secondly, we know that the Adamic people of today originated from the one family of Noah and his three sons — who were perfect in their descent, bloodline, and generation as the Bible tells us. “These are the generations of Noah: Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God” Genesis 6:9 KJV. The word for generations in this verse, in the first instance could better be translated as race, and the second as descent or abiding. So this is the race of Noah and then it explains what is the race of Noah, that he was perfect in his descent or abiding meaning all the way back from Adam to Noah’s family and his sons, they were all Adamic. Around 400 years ago when the KJV was translated, that’s what generation actually meant. The word didn’t mean people born in a particular time period as constituting a generation. That’s a modern meaning that was overlaid onto the original meaning of the word. Back then, generation meant one’s race.
So Noah was perfect in his race because he didn’t mix with the Nephilim, the descendants of the fallen angels who were not of the Adamic race. Therefore, Noah’s sons were also perfect in their generation. They were pure and unmixed. It’s logical to conclude that the Adamic people of old who descended from Noah’s sons must have all looked pretty much the same physically. They bore a family resemblance because they actually were one huge, expanding family. But as the generations went by, their genetic make-up and appearance began to change.
But why and how? The key to understanding this population change is knowing that Noah’s flood did not cover the entire world as many people believe and many churches teach. Rather, the flood was local. But why was it local? Yahweh wanted to punish and correct His creation, the Adamic people, and not the “whole world” that was populated by races He did not create. He was punishing Adamkind for mixing with the Nephilim, so the flood was limited to the areas where the Adamics lived. Of course, all living things within the vicinity would have been wiped out as well, but outside those areas, the Nephilim from the fallen angels and the Satanic descendants of Cain (as described in Genesis) would have survived.
We’ll explain more about Noah’s flood in a later Proof, but the key to understanding it as a local phenomenon is the Hebrew word “erets” (Strongs #776) that simply means “land or earth.” However, “earth” doesn’t have the modern meaning of the whole earth or world. It just means a piece of land. Here we see in the North American Standard Bible, “erets” is translated as earth 655 times and as land 1581 times but as the world only three times.
When it says Yahweh flooded the land or earth — the “erets” — it doesn’t actually mean the whole world. It just means the land, and in this case, the land that Adamic people were inhabiting at Noah’s time. However, because it’s mistranslated the whole world, people are led to believe that the flood destroyed everything and everyone worldwide. Based on this false presupposition, it follows logically that anyone who lived after the flood must have been descended from Noah. But once you realize that only the Adamic race was wiped out (except for Noah and his family) and that the Nephilim and descendants of Cain actually survived, you will realize that not all the world’s population today are Adamic and certainly not all descended from Noah.
So there’s no need for crazy theories such as Og of Bashan, a giant, hiding on the roof of Noah’s ark and reintroducing the Nephilim into the world after the flood. Or that Ham’s wife was actually a Nephilim and so Ham’s line respawned them. Or that a second incursion of fallen angels mating with Adamites occurred after the flood. All of the above is nonsense and unBiblical. We have a simple, logical explanation to account for how the Nephilim and descendants of Cain survived, and that explanation is that the flood was local.
Who are these Nephilim and descendants of Cain who caused so much trouble for the Adamites? First of all, there’s much confusion about this verse due to the mistranslation of the word Nephilim. It’s often mistranslated as “giants” but it actually means “fallen ones” and refers to the fallen angels. In some translations, the Nephilim are called the “sons of God” and in others, the “sons of heaven.” The “sons of heaven” translation makes it clearer that they are fallen angels, fallen from their place in heaven (due to rebellion against Yahweh).
The passage goes on to say that these sons of heaven or fallen angels mated with the daughters of man. The word for “man” here (in daughters of man) is “Adam” but the men produced from these unions with the fallen angels are called “ish,” a Hebrew word that means “man” but not Adamic man.
Once the mistranslations are cleared up, we get the picture. The descendants of the fallen angels were living on the earth both before and after Noah’s flood. After the flood, these enemies of God and the Adamic family gradually crept back into the Adamic world through intermarrying and breeding with Adamics. So the Adamic blood became polluted. Thus we can understand how the demographics gradually began to change.
Christ warned that by the time He returns, the world will be like it was at the time of Noah. In that time before the flood, cross-breeding was rampant. Basically, all the Adamic lands were completely swarmed and overrun by the Nephilim and the evil descendants of Cain. Christ predicted that things would be like that again before His return. And indeed, our lands are swarmed and overrun by the enemies of God and the demographics of our formerly white countries are steadily being changed.
The Bible gives us plenty of proof that the Nephilim survived the flood. Throughout the book of Genesis, we read about numerous tribes and bipeds who are identified by names that clearly show that they did not descend from Noah. So where did these tribes come from? Clearly, they must have been remnants from the Nephilim.
For example in Genesis 14, Abraham rescued his nephew, Lot, who had been captured by the victors in a war amongst neighboring kings. These kings had subdued the Rephaim, which could be translated as giants linked to the Nephilim, and the Zuzim, which means roving creatures, and Emim, which means terrors. Abraham formed an army of three hundred and eighteen men from amongst his camp and went out to rescue his kin. From the descriptions of the people conquered by the kings, it’s obvious that there were non-Adamic people after the flood and that these giants, roving creatures, and terrors fought against Yahweh’s people.
Later in Numbers 13, Moses sent several Israelite men out to spy on the neighboring lands to assess their military strength. The people inhabiting the lands of Canaan were described as Nephilim. “We saw the Nephilim people there. (The Anakites come from the Nephilim people.) We felt like grasshoppers, and we looked like grasshoppers to them” Numbers 13:33 NCV. Sometimes this is mistranslated as “giants” again. The tribe of Anakites who lived in Canaan is described as descending from the Nephilim survivors of the flood. And some of them ostensibly were of gigantic stature. Regardless, this passage is more evidence non-Adamics survived the flood.
Furthermore, we can show that the descendants of Cain are also mentioned as existing after the flood. Generally however whenever the tribe of Cain is mentioned, it is translated as Kenites. This translation can cause confusion. In Genesis 15 where Yahweh blesses Abraham and promises him the land of Canaan and lists the current tribes inhabiting it, the tribe of Cain is clearly mentioned, although as we said, it’s translated as Kenites rather than Cainites.
“In the same day the Lord made a covenant with Abram, saying, Unto thy seed have I given this land, from the river of Egypt unto the great river, the river Euphrates: The Kenites, and the Kenizzites, and the Kadmonites, And the Hittites, and the Perizzites, and the Rephaims, And the Amorites, and the Canaanites, and the Girgashites, and the Jebusites” Genesis 15:18-21 KJV.
“Kenites” for the tribe of Cain seems confusing at first, but if we analyze the Hebrew word for Cain, things will become clear. In Hebrew, Cain would be spelled Qop, Yod, Nun. Since we’ve already gone over the Hebrew letters in a previous Proof, you might remember:
The Qop was a “k” sound
The Yud could be an “i” or “j” sound
The Nun was just an “n”
Now, it’s presumed there was a hidden “a” vowel sound after the Qop. So you get Kajin or Kain/Cain. Our modern translators just went with Cain. Here’s where it gets interesting. When you look at the Hebrew word which was translated to Kenites, it’s the exact same word as Cain except there’s a Yod or an “i” added onto the end. In Hebrew, when you wanted to say “the tribe of so and so,” you’d add an “i” onto the end of the proper name. So it’s obvious that Kenites means tribe of Cain. It’s also obvious from the context that Cain’s descendants were in the land of Canaan mixing with the Caananites.
There’s another proof we’ll mention here and that is in Numbers 24 where Balak hired the prophet Balaam to curse the Israelites. As Balaam tried to do so, Yahweh prevented him and instead made Balaam bless Israel instead and give several prophecies regarding the other people in the land of Canaan.
Most specifically regarding Cain or the tribe of Cain, it states that they will “be wasted” until in the future, Asshur or the Assyrians took the Israelites away captive. We’ll talk about that in a sec, just looking at the Hebrew words here the first Kenites is again Cain with an “i” on the end to form Caini meaning tribe of Cain, but the second Kenite is just Cain. So here we see how the translators really messed up and made it Kenite. It could better be translated as the tribe of Cain or Cainites, and then simply Cain the second time. Regardless, these two verses clearly show that the tribe of Cain was linked to Cain and was living there in the land of Canaan.
“And he looked on the Kenites, and took up his parable, and said, Strong is thy dwelling place, and thou puttest thy nest in a rock. Nevertheless, the Kenite shall be wasted until Asshur shall carry thee away captive” Numbers 24:21-22 KJV.
This prophecy means that the tribes living in the land of Canaan when the Israelites invaded had all intermixed with the descendants of Cain. So they were of Cain or Kenites. When the Israelites invaded, they were defeated, forced into submission, and marginalized. But once the Israelites were deported by the Assyrians, the Kenites regained their strength.
So it is that with a little study, we can see that the Nephilim and the descendants of Cain were still around after the flood. We can also see that with the passage of time, the Adamic race intermixed with them and went off into paganism. This is why Yahweh created Israel. The Israelites were to be the only Adamics who would remain separate and pure in their bloodline. Yahweh made covenants with Israel, gave them His law, forbade them to intermix, and promised them that He would always preserve them and that they would prevail in the end.
Since we know that the Adamic race fell into paganism due to mixing, we should ask, when did all this mixing start? As we’ve just shown, the mixing was first recorded in the land of Canaan, although not explicitly. Canaan was a son of Ham and was an Adamite, as were his sons. But by Abraham’s time over a thousand years later, the lands of Canaan were full of these non-Adamic tribes. After the Israelites invaded, it was no longer possible to distinguish who was from which tribe, so the Israelites called them all Canaanites. All non-Adamics in the area were Canaanites. Inevitably, due to living in close proximity, the Adamics had also mixed with them and obliterated their own identity. It’s also likely that the Nephelim and the descendants of Cain were also actively infiltrating all the Adamic nations as roaming vagabond merchants as the curse of Cain suggested they would do for all time.
This pattern of intermixing going back for such a long time was why Abraham insisted his son, Isaac, married a woman from his own kin. Abraham sent Eliezer his servant over five hundred miles north to Abraham’s homeland to find a suitable wife for Isaac and bring her back. Abraham couldn’t risk marrying Isaac to a Canaanite woman. Even though the tribe of Canaan started off as Adamic and some of the tribes at that period may still have been pure Adamic, if Isaac married a Canaanite, he could never be sure of her genealogy. But the family could be sure of the genealogy of their own kinfolk.
“And Abraham was old, and well stricken in age: and the Lord had blessed Abraham in all things. And Abraham said unto the eldest servant of his house, that ruled over all that he had, Put, I pray thee, thy hand under my thigh: And I will make thee swear by the Lord, the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou shalt not take a wife unto my son of the daughters of the Canaanites, among whom I dwell: But thou shalt go unto my country, and to my kindred, and take a wife unto my son Isaac” Genesis 24:1-4 KJV.
In the next generation, Esau, even though he was the elder, lost his birthright because he had married Canaanite women, thus destroying his bloodline. But Jacob inherited the birthright because he obeyed his parents, Isaac and Rebecca, and made the arduous five-hundred-mile trip north to find a wife amongst his own kin. By doing this, he could be absolutely sure that his wife (or in this case, wives) was Adamic.
“And Isaac called Jacob, and blessed him, and charged him, and said unto him, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of Canaan. Arise, go to Padanaram, to the house of Bethuel thy mother’s father; and take thee a wife from thence of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother” Genesis 28:1-2 KJV.
Many years later after the Exodus from slavery in Egypt, Jacob and his twelve sons were back in Canaan. We can see from their dealings with Shechem that it was common policy for the Canaanites to intermarry with their neighbors, which would have included non-Adamics. We can see that Jacob staunchly resisted such intermarriage.
The next Biblical account of intermarriage and mixing is during the reign of King Solomon, which was around 900 BC. Here we see the first mention of the word “Arabia” when Solomon received gifts from all the neighboring kingdoms and tribes, including the kings and governors of Arabia.
“And all the kings of Arabia and governors of the country brought gold and silver to Solomon” 2 Chronicles 9:14 KJV.
As we explained previously, the lands of Cush lay below the land of Canaan and also extended to the other side of the Red Sea. In actuality, the country of Cush was split into two distinct parts. After a number of years, the first Cush below the land of Canaan was renamed Arabia. It must have been renamed for a good reason. Why? What changed? Did this Cush just disappear?
Cush’s name change clues us in about the population change in that area. Cush was renamed “Arabia” after it was settled by continuous waves of new tribes such as the Ishmaelites, the Edomites, the descendants of Keturah, and many more who were not the original Cushite inhabitants. These new tribes intermarried with each other and with the original inhabitants of Cush and eventually lost all their tribal identities. From the perspective of our Israelite ancestors, just as with the Canaanites, it became impossible to identify what people came from what tribe. The people were adulterated beyond identification. Thus Cush and its new people were renamed Arabia. This name is important and significant for our purposes because it is a Hebrew word that means “to mix” and “to grow dark.” With all the mixing, the population was literally growing darker and eventually became known as Arabs. We’ll cover the meaning of the word Arab in more depth in a later Proof.
The same process was also happening in the western Cush territory (today called Ethiopia). Being far closer to Sub-Saharan Africa, these Cushites had been bringing in black slaves for centuries and gradually the population had begun mixing with the slaves. One of the provinces of this Cushite kingdom was a region called Nubia. At one time, the area was called the Cushite Kingdom and the Nubian Kingdom interchangeably.
By 700 BC, that’s just over 200 years after Solomon, Egypt was overrun by the black Nubians (Cushites). After roughly fifty years, the Egyptians were able to rise up and push the Nubians back out of their kingdom. But the blood of the native white Egyptians (Mizraim) had been genetically mixed and never recovered. This is verified in the Bible, where Isaiah around the same time of 700 BC states that Yahweh has given up Egypt, Ethiopia, and Seba. Ethiopia was, as we’ve seen, the western kingdom of Cush/Nubia and Seba is an area within Arabia. Who could Yahweh possibly have given up these nations to other than Satan? Clearly being overrun with mixed blood is what Yahweh means by giving up an Adamic nation, and Egypt, Ethiopia, and Seba are prime examples.
“For I am the LORD thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee” Isaiah 43:3 KJV.
Now 100 years later around 600 BC Jeremiah states rhetorically can an Ethiopian change his skin, or a leopard its spots. A leopard obviously cannot change its appearance, so why would Jeremiah make such an analogy? Nobody can change their skin, so what does Jeremiah mean? What Jeremiah means is Cush of the West, which is translated as Ethiopia here, because they were overrun and mixed out of existence, their bastard offspring could not change their appearance. The People living there now can never go back, as they are bastards.
“Can an Ethiopian change his skin or a leopard its spots? Neither can you do good who are accustomed to doing evil.” Jeremiah 13:23 NIV
We should note here that all the former Adamic nations came from the sons of Noah and each had a patriarch. For example, the Assyrians came from Assur, who came from Shem, son of Noah. The Egyptians came from Mizraim, who came from Ham, the son of Noah. The Ionian Greeks came from Javan, who came from Japheth, son of Noah. But Arabia was different. Arabia had no single origin nor single patriarch. It was a mixture, an amalgamation of various tribes. These tribes included the descendants of Cain and the Nephilim. Egypt and Cush/Nubia also followed the same fate.
If we jump ahead in history to around 600 AD and onwards, we see the rise of Islam in Arabia and their relentless conquests of surrounding areas. Now converted to Islam, these mixed and darkened people from Arabia launched invasion after invasion all across the Middle East, North Africa, and into Europe. By 622-632 AD, Islam first spread to all of Arabia under Muhammad, then by 632-661 AD to the Middle East and Egypt, then by 661-750 AD to the west part of Northern Africa, the island of Sicily, and also Spain. The Arabic Muslim conquests greatly accelerated the demographic change of the entire region. The former people and nations in those regions became mixed and were changed irrevocably forever.
In Europe — which had been Adamic, Israelite, and white — the demographics of the regions which the Arabs invaded were changed forever, although remnants in northern Spain held out and were able to push back centuries later. Closer to our time, by around 1100 to 1200 AD, the Arabic Turks began invading the Byzantine Empire (Greece), Cyprus, and other islands of the Mediterranean and the regions above the Caucasus mountains. Eventually, the Turks reached parts of Eastern Europe, once again changing the demographics of those people permanently.
These Arabic invasions and subsequent intermingling explain why and how the populations of the Middle East, North Africa, parts of southern Europe, and Eastern Europe changed and are no longer Adamic and Israelite as they once had been. We can easily see from historical art and statuary that the ancient Greeks, Italians, and Spaniards and their great men such as Alexander the Great of Macedonia and Julius Caesar of Rome all looked like any modern, native white European. However, the people living in these areas now generally do not look like people in these recordings of history. That’s because these countries and people were overrun by Arabic conquerors and thus were darkened forever. This exact pattern happened earlier in history with the Middle East and North Africa.
The idea that the white race has a subsection called “Mediterranean Caucasians” or “olive-skinned whites” is a lie and a deception. Yes, whites have the ability to tan, but our natural appearance is white and ruddy, as the name Adam indicates. If a nation or people are all olive-skinned as certainly Greece, Southern Italy, and large parts of Spain are today, it is an indication that their white blood has been intermixed. This is due to these invasions and mixing that happened many centuries ago.
In today’s world, these facts are not talked about. In fact, they are passed over and must not be mentioned. History has all but been rewritten. We are led to assume that the various populations have never changed and, for example, the people of North Africa always were the dark people they today. Even the newly touted and widely available genetic testing makes this false assumption and reinforces the falsehood. But with the knowledge that this assumption about unchanging populations is false, we can realize the truth: that the Israelites were white and the regions and nations around them were originally white too. All Adamic people descending from white Noah and his three white sons were white. But with these Adamics mixing with non-Adamics and especially with the Arab invasions, our former home in the Middle East changed forever.
The pattern continues to this very day. As we were warned several times in the Revelation, for example in Revelation 12 that Satan or the Serpent (who is collectively the descendants of Cain and the fallen angels) would cast out a flood of non-Israelitess to overrun the woman. The woman is the Israelites, the bride of Yahweh who he will remarry in the supper of lamb. This was those initial invasion into Europe and has already happened. Later in Revelation 20 we are warned again that they will gather all the non-Israelite, mongrel nations to surround, overrun and overwhelm the “camp of the saints,” or the remaining Israelites, in order to destroy God’s people. This is happening right now, just look at our cities. We will cover this in a later proof. This is Yahweh’s chastisement of His people. Thus we see these mixed multitudes of non-Adamic invading our once Adamic countries. According to Scripture, they will try to swarm, overrun, and completely overwhelm the Israelite nations. This invasion is growing more evident day by day to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear. In the time of Noah only one family remained, when Christ returns how many families will remain?