“This is the genealogy of Noah. Noah was a just man, perfect in his [descent] generations. Noah walked with God” Genesis 6:9 KJV.
When Noah stepped off the ark with his wife, their three sons, and three daughters-in-law, this small group of eight constituted all that was left of the Adamic race. Yahweh decreed that they and their descendants would restart Adamic civilization and that one day, great nations would come of them. It goes without question that if all these nations came from one man, Noah, then they all would share similar DNA and be distinct-looking people. If we can trace these nations back to Noah, then we can find out what Noah and his sons looked like. Since the Israelites also descended from Noah, we can also know what they looked like.
With that end in mind, let’s go through the sons of Noah one by one and trace the nations that came from them and what history tells us about their physical appearance. Noah’s sons were Japheth, Ham, and Shem.
“The sons of Japheth; Gomer, and Magog, and Madai, and Javan, and Tubal, and Meshech, and Tiras” Genesis 10:2 KJV.
Noah’s son Japheth had seven sons. Best known to us today are Javan, Madai, and Tiras. Few if any historical records about the other four sons have survived. But if we can identify three out of seven of the sons as white, it would be logical to assume that the other four were also white.
In Genesis Chapter 10, verses 5, 20, and 31, the sons of Noah were assigned territories. The Japhethites were specifically given the “isles” or “coastlands.” So from the earliest times, the Japhethites were sea people. They lived along the waterways from the Caspian and Black Seas to as far west as Spain. Neither the Shemites nor the Hamites were given these areas, although the Hamitic Philistines also plied the waves. After a considerable length of time, these Japhethites were rivaled at sea by the Shemitic Israelite Phoenicians, who were also successful sea traders. Thus as Noah’s prophecy foretold, Japheth dwelt in the tents of Shem, meaning that Shem would rule Japheth and largely absorb the Japhethites.
The origins of these ancient (Japhethic) sea peoples puzzle modern anthropologists, archaeologists, and historians; these scholars mistakenly claim the sea people were Caucasians from the Aegean area who had invaded the Mediterranean around 3000 BC. But the true origin of the sea people is much more straightforward and is recorded in Genesis Chapter 10: the sea people were Japhethites, one of the white Adamite nations descended from Noah.
Most of the Greek history that has survived is from the Athenians (Ionians). All of their art and history depict them as white
Javan (Yavana), son of Japheth, is the father of Ionian Greeks. Athens became the Ionian’s most populous city, although the Ionians also spread to the islands of the Mediterranean and the coasts of Spain. Their records, artwork, and historical writings clearly describe these people as white, frequently with blond hair. Most surviving Greek history was written by Athenian historians, including Homer, Thucydides, Plato, and Xenophon, who were most definitely white. Javan had four sons:
“And the sons of Javan; Elishah, and Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. By these were the isles of the Gentiles [nations] divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations” Genesis 10:4-5 KJV.
The Bible records the civilizations that came from Javan’s sons: Elishah, Tarshish, Kittim, and Dodanim. Elishah and Kittim can be identified with Cyprus. To this day, there is a city called Kittim in Cyprus. Tarshish was a seaport in Spain. It is frequently mentioned in the Scriptures, including the Psalms. King Solomon used Tarshish for supplies to build the temple. The prophet Jonah tried to jump into a ship to Tarshish to avoid going to warn the Assyrians. Dodanim is often mistranslated as Rhodium, and they can be identified with the Greeks of Rhode.
Javan is also mentioned numerous times as being connected to the tribe of Dan. For example in Ezekiel 27 (we shall explain this Ezekiel passage in a later Proof) Yahweh speaks against Tyre, giving a lengthy discourse condemning their international trade. In verse 19: “Dan also and Javan going to and fro occupied in thy fairs: bright iron, cassia, and calamus, were in thy market.” So we see Javan and Dan mentioned together. Understanding that they are Ionian Greeks and Danaan Greeks respectively, it becomes clear why they are listed together; they lived in the same region and became culturally interwoven. Javan’s descendants became the Ionian Greeks, perhaps the oldest of the Greek tribes. The Danaan Greeks arrived later when a large number of Israelites broke away from those who followed Moses into the desert after the Exodus from Egypt. This break-away group was largely from the tribe of Dan. They set sail for Greece and settled there.
Madai, another son of Japheth, was the father of the Medes. The Medes were the only Japhethite tribe located in the Middle East, where they were neighbors to Elam (Persia). The Persians were Shemites, from Elam, the oldest son of Noah’s son Shem. The Medes and the Persians eventually became allies. At first, the Medes were the dominant partner, but that changed by the time of Cyrus the Great who was the son of a governor from Persia and a princess of the Medes. Under Cyrus, the Medo-Persian empire arose (the second Beast Empire of Daniel’s prophecy) and replaced the Babylonian Empire.
The Medes were the first nation to call themselves Aryans. Linguistically, it’s likely that Aryan is derived from two Hebrew words: “Ar” meaning mountain, and “Yah” which is a shortened form of Yahweh. Thus Aryah (Aryan) means “the mountain of Yahweh.” This mountain isn’t necessarily a physical mountain because the children of Israel are the true mountain of Yahweh. This name appeared about 300 BC, around the time when the Israelite “Lost Tribes” began to take control of the Japhethite tribes. The Assyrians had deported the Israelites to regions close to the Medes. In time, the Israelites came to dominate the Medes. Thus this very Hebrew name most likely originated with the Israelites rather than from the Medes, despite the fact that historians at the time mistakenly accredited the Aryan name to the Medes.
The Greek historians were very familiar with the Medo-Persian Empire. Homer referred to King Cyrus as a “mule” because Cyrus was half Mede and half Persian. Homer’s attitude shows us that mixing different tribes was considered unusual and was held in a certain amount of contempt. Nevertheless, the historians made no mention of black, Arab, or dark people in the Medo-Persian Empire. Xenophon the Athenian general fought in Persia against the Medo-Persian, and he never mentioned non-white people amongst them.
The Kingdom of Thrace, a massive landmass of Thracians. Their location put them between the Greeks and Middle East Empires.
Tiras, another son of Japheth, is the ancestor of the ancient Thracians. The Thracian lands were massive and included the Balkans and modern-day Romania and Bulgaria. The Thracians grew to be incredibly numerous and were considered “barbarians” by the Greeks and Romans. Herodotus called them one of the most numerous people in the world. Their vast numbers fulfill the prophecy that Yahweh would enlarge Japheth.
Since Thrace was geographically near to Greece and the Middle East, the Thracians were heavily involved in wars. They were frequently hired as mercenaries in the battles between the Athenians and the Spartans, as well as between the Macedonians and the Persians. After Alexander the Great’s death, his general Lysimachus inherited Macedonia, Thrace, and Asia Minor. Eventually, the masses of Israelite Scythian/Germanic tribes migrated into Europe and overran Thrace. The Scythians enslaved many of the Thracians and took them along as they spread farther in Europe. These Thracian slaves were called “thralls,” which is a name that appears often in old Germanic tales. Descendants of the Thracians have lived among us for many centuries and probably still live amongst us today.
The Thracians were not the only Japhetite tribe to lose their identity and be forcibly swept along with the Israelite Germanic tribes as they moved across Europe. We will describe other Japhetite tribes shortly, but first, we must reaffirm the truth that Europe has always been white and only white until the recent third-world mass migration invasions. We can find no mention of black, dark, or swarthy people being with the Germanic tribes anywhere in history no matter how hard we look. Even their slaves were white. How then could the Thracians — or any of the Japhethite tribes who descended from white Noah — not have been white?
A picture of a Russian woman today.
Tubal and Meshech, also sons of Japheth, settled above the Caucasus Mountains. There is hardly any surviving recorded history of them. However, when the Israelite Germanic tribes migrated over the Caucasus after the Assyrian deportation, these Germanics encountered tribes descended from Tubal and Meshech and displaced them farther north into the land we call Russia today. One of the tribes was called the Moski which is likely derived from Meshech. Moski is where the name Moscow comes from. Russian also has a city named Tubal. Thus we see the remnants of the Japhetite tribes in modern Russia.
Much later around 900 AD, the region that would be called Russia was populated by many tribes of Japhetite origin, including Tubal and Meshech. Then another Israelite Germanic tribe known as the Rus migrated from Scandinavia, conquered these tribes, and formed a loose federation. The Rus became the identifying name of the region, and Rus is where we get the name Russia. The Russians are just as white as the English, Americans, Germans, and other white nations. Therefore if the Rus conquered and intermixed with Tubal and Meshech, then these Japhetite tribes must have been white. If they weren’t, then white Russians would not be white today.
Gomer and Magog were Japhethite tribes located in the lands above Greece, but Greek history has few records of them. Then there’s the little matter of the invading Germanic hordes who swept away everything in their path, including the tribes of Gomer and Magog. Thus it is difficult to find solid traces of these two tribes; however, very likely the Slavs who became so populous in the East of Europe were remnants of Gomer and Magog.
The Slavs were made up of European Japhetite tribes conquered by the Germanic tribes plus the slaves those Germanic hordes brought with them (Assyrians, Medes, and others). The name Slav is derived from the word “slave.” Later, these Slavs absorbed the last of the Adamic whites migrating north out of the Middle East. Between the fifth and tenth centuries BC, the remnants of Adamic people in the Middle East began migrating north, possibly due to the Middle East’s gradual transformation into an Abrabised hellhole. (Could this be the original white flight?) These Adamics made their way over the Caucasus Mountains just as the Germanic tribes had done centuries before. They mixed with the Slavs in East Europe and also became known as Slavs. Over the centuries, various Germanic tribes conquered the Slavs. All these Adamic peoples intermixed. Interestingly enough, although the Israelite Germanics ruled the Adamic peoples, the Slavic language prevailed in those regions. We will discuss the Slavs in greater depth in a later Proof.
But right now, let’s take a look at these migrations from the angle of genetics. Since the Germanic tribes mixed with the Slavs and their descendants did not turn dark, brown, and swarthy, but remained white, just as white as any other European nation, then these Slavs, which include Gomer and Magog, must have been white, just as the Germanic tribes were white. Whilst there are clearly a few different and distinct characteristics between West and East Europeans, there is no mistaking that the typical native East European is a white man or woman.
Today, one falsehood commonly promulgated and unfortunately accepted is that Ham’s descendants were black. This is yet another impossible, implausible piece of nonsense. As we’ve already mentioned, it is a benighted and fallacious effort to attempt to attribute all races to Noah and his three white sons. The ultimate purpose of this deception of designating Noah as the progenitor of the dark races is to steal the white identity of the true Israelites. However, while neither Ham nor his sons were black, it is true that the descendants of Ham were the first to disappear from history due to race-mixing with the darker races.
“And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan” Genesis 10:6 KJV.
Cush, son of Ham, is the ancestor of the Cushites. Cush is noted for being the grandfather of Nimrod, the king or tyrant who founded the first Adamic empire — the Cushite Empire — and rebelled against Yahweh by building the Tower of Babel. Nimrod’s Cushite Empire included the city of Babel and surrounding cities such as Nineveh (which later would be the capital of the Assyrian Empire) and Akkad and Assur. We can determine the location of Nimrod’s Babylon because thousands of years later King Nebuchadnezzar (a Shemite) rebuilt Babylon. Nimrod’s empire, which ended with Yahweh’s destruction of the Tower of Babel, was likely around 2900 to 2800 BC or it could have been even earlier, around 3000 BC. Whatever the date, the Cushite Empire was very early in the history of the Adamic nations, only two generations after Noah’s Flood when the Adamic tribes lived in close proximity in the Middle East. After the Tower of Babel rebellion, Yahweh scattered the Adamic nations and confused their languages. This occasioned the collapse of the Cushite Empire.
By the time of Abraham (2000 BC), all that remained of Cush were the lands now known as Saudia Arabia and Ethiopia. After Nimrod’s empire fell and other Adamic nations began to rise up and compete with each other, the Cushites must have drifted farther south geographically. The Red Sea between Saudia Arabia and Ethiopia is at its narrowest point only thirty-three miles wide. It’s easy to see how the Cushites got their start in Saudia Arabia and later sailed west to colonize Ethiopia.
Thus developed Cush of the East (Saudi Arabia) and Cush of the West (Ethiopia). Unfortunately, when the Bible mentions Cush, it never explicitly indicates which Cush. This omission can lead to confusion, but most of the time, we can figure things out. For example, after Moses fled Egypt, he traveled east to Cush where he found a wife. Since he traveled east, this was the Cush of the East (Saudi Arabia) and not the Cush of the West (Ethiopia). Although many modern Bible teachers think that Cush was filled with blacks, both Cush lands were originally white Adamics. Moses certainly did not marry a Negress.
One witness that the Cushites were white can be found in the name Ethiopia. The Greeks gave the name Ethiopia to the Cush of the West, and that name has remained to this day. (Empires often gave names to lands under their control.) The Greeks understood that both Cush lands were the same culture and people; thus they called the two regions West Ethiopia and East Ethiopia. What is most fascinating is that the word Ethiopia literally means “sunburnt face” or “shining face” or “glowing face,” and that description only fits white people living in the scorching heat of those regions. Blacks don’t get sunburnt faces. In hot climates, they simply grow blacker. The Ethiopians were originally white. Why else would the Greeks have given them a name that meant sunburned face?
But it’s not just the meaning of the name Ethiopia that witnesses to the original whiteness of the Cushites. We can also draw on historical records. Greek historians frequently mentioned men from Ethiopia, and they always described these people as white. In the oldest epic stories, such as the Trojan Wars (1250 BC) onwards, no blacks or Arabs are ever mentioned. Only around 700 BC, do we begin to see darker races entering the picture, although initially, they were merely curiosities on the far fringes of the white civilizations.
We can also find a witness to whiteness in what is left unsaid (or what is so obvious that there is no need to mention it). How often is it necessary to mention that snow is white or water is wet? In the Trojan Wars, King Priam of the Trojans, after his son Hector was slain by Achilles was sent to procure aid from King Memnon the Ethiopian ruler. Priam was supplied with an army of Ethiopians. He fought the great Achilles, even wounding him but Priam was ultimately slain. In the historical records, no mention is ever made that the Ethiopians were black. The presence of blacks amongst the white warriors would have been noteworthy enough to mention. But on this matter, the records and literature are silent.
Then there is the explicit witness. In the first century BC, historian Diodorus Siculus wrote in his Bibliotheca Historica (which is largely about geography) about two types of people living in Ethiopia. Diodorus draws from much earlier historians (as was his habit) to describe the various peoples of African Ethiopia, and it is evident that those tribes contrast with one another quite starkly.
The first Ethiopians he described were cultured and educated. They honored the gods, Siculus noted. They quoted Homer. They recounted unsuccessful invasions into their country by Cambyses and Semiramis. They claimed that Egyptians led by Osiris first colonized Ethiopia. They boasted they had two types of writing, as the Egyptians did: one popular or demotic; the other sacred or hieroglyphic. Their priests were much like Egyptian priests. The Ethiopians believed their kings gained sovereignty by Divine Providence. Their laws and punishments came from custom. They practiced the same “flight of refuge” as the Greeks, similar to the Hebrew Levitical “cities of refuge.” One Ethiopian king under Ptolemy was educated in Greece and studied philosophy. Aside from a few odd customs, Diodorus Siculus concluded, there was no reason to consider these Ethiopians (whose physical characteristics he never mentions, perhaps because they were similar to his) to be different from the rest of the civilized white world.
In stark contrast, Diororus described other inhabitants of the country: “But there are also a great many other tribes of the Ethiopians, some of them dwelling in the land lying on both banks of the Nile and on the islands in the river, others inhabiting the neighboring country of Arabia. The majority of them, and especially those who dwell along the river, are black in color and have flat noses and wooly hair. As for their spirit, they are entirely savage and display the nature of a wild beast…and are as far removed as possible from human kindness to one another…and cultivating none of the practices of civilized life…they present a striking contrast when considered in the light of our own customs” Library of History (3.8.1).
Obviously, Diodorus was describing the Nubians and other wandering black tribes of the region. Besides confirming through contrast that the founding Ethiopians were white, this savage black presence in the land foreshadowed the demise of white Ethiopia. In Scripture, Yahweh declares that He gave up Ethiopia. But to whom? To His friends? Or His enemies? History shows that around 700 BC, Ethiopia and her ally Egypt were overrun by those black tribes and Nubians. Before long, both nations were race-mixed out of existence.
We could ask why did Yahweh abandon Egypt and Ethiopia to the black hordes? Since both Adamic nations had long since turned to paganism, Yahweh had simply given them up to their own ways. All Adamic nations, in fact, turned to paganism (even Israel) but only Israel had been given a covenant and the promise of a Saviour. Yahweh would preserve Israel from the plague of race-mixing and bring her back from paganism through chastisement. Hence when Israel refused to repent and instead turned to Egypt for military assistance against the Assyrians, Yahweh removed Egypt as an effective military aid. No longer was Egypt a powerful military nation due to its self-inflicted Negro problem. So Egypt and her ally Ethiopia were abandoned to their suicidal race-mixing, and Israel was delivered to the punishment of deportation.
“For I am the Lord thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee” Isaiah 43.3.
Above are the remains of numerous ancient Pharaohs found in their tombs. Note the overwhelming evidence of blond and red hair, white skin, and white features.
Mizraim, son of Ham, is the forefather of the Egyptians. Whenever the Scripture talks about Egyptians, it refers to them as Mizraim. No other race has been surrounded by so much confusion and contention regarding their appearance, racial origins, and skin color as the ancient Egyptians. But this confusion is a modern, deliberately generated confusion. It is, in fact, antichrist propaganda to promote the deception and idolatry of Afrocentrism.
There’s no denying the current agenda to make the ancient Egyptians black. But for what purpose? Basically, it’s a simple switcheroo or sleight-of-hand. If the Egyptians were black, then the Israelites were black. If the Israelites were black, then whites cannot be the true Israelites. It’s all part of the antichrist theft of our identity, and we need to counter this deception with the truth. As we read the Bible, it becomes obvious that the Egyptians and the Israelites belonged to the same racial group and must have been indistinguishable in appearance. Moses, for example, was raised by Pharaoh’s daughter. Can we imagine that Moses was of a different race and color than the royal household? And that this went unmentioned? The truth is both the Egyptians and Israelites were white.
Fortunately for the cause of truth, the remains of many mummified pharaohs and Egyptian royalty have been dug up, and most of them have fair or reddish hair and blue eyes. Their facial features and especially their skull shape prove they were white. Egyptian artwork clearly depicts the native Egyptian males as white with golden/bronze tans, and the native Egyptian women as pale white. Men often worked outside in the heat, and being white and wearing minimal clothing, they tanned. The women were fully clothed and sheltered inside and thus remained pale. On the odd occasion, the artwork depicted foreign slaves and some of them were black. The Egyptians had begun traveling down to sub-Saharan Africa to bring back black slaves. This importing of non-white blood was ultimately the downfall of white Egypt, heralding that unfortunate country being completely overrun by dark races many centuries later. As a non-white nation, Egypt never regained its former glory and importance, not to this day.
The Bible not only tells us about the decline of Ethiopia but also of Egypt. “I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee” Isaiah 43:3. Numerous verses indicated that the glories of Egypt were over and the civilization was collapsing. Jeremiah tells us that the Pharaohs were finished, “They cried there, ‘Pharaoh, king of Egypt, is but a noise. He has passed by the appointed time!’” Jeremiah 46:17. In Isaiah 19:4 we read: “And I will deliver Egypt into the hands of harsh lords and kings who will rule over them….” The lesson is clear: once a white Adamic nation goes black, it never comes back.
The Philistines were in the line of Ham, son of Noah. They were descendants of Mizraim (also known as Egypt) through his son Casluhim. Therefore, the Philistines were an offshoot Adamic nation from the white Egyptians. Although the Philistines were not one of the original tribes directly from the sons of Noah, they played a large role in the Biblical narrative.
“And Mizraim begat Ludim, and Anamim, and Lehabim, and Naphtuhim, And Pathrusim, and Casluhim, (out of whom came Philistim,) and Caphtorim” Genesis 10:14-14.
These Philistines colonized lands just south of Canaan and consequently, they are frequently mentioned in the Bible. When the Israelites moved in and conquered Canaan, the strife between the Israelites and the Philistines was constant. Sometimes the Israelites had the upper hand; sometimes, the Philistines. During the period of the Judges (four hundred years), the Philistines had the upper hand and even banned the Israelites from possessing weapons.
Another major ruse to steal the identity of white Israelites is falsifying the Philistines’ origins. The deception consists of two planks. One plank is to claim that the Philistines were a race of giants due to being related to the Kenites. This assertion is based on the fact that the Philistines employed the giant Goliath to fight against the Israelites. This was the Goliath whom King David slew when he was still a boy. However, Goliath was not a Philistine. He was a mercenary hired into their army. The surrounding Canaanite lands were filled with bastard nations descended from the Kenites, Rephaim, and others. There the Philistines could easily find mercenaries, including giants, willing to fight the Israelites.
The other plank of the deception revolves around the Philistines’ status as sea traders and claims they were not white. This is a more insidious deception than the disinformation about Goliath. The Philistines and the Ionian Greeks were sea-farers who established colonies around the Mediterranean. Later, they were both surpassed by the mighty Phoenicians, who also created colonies far and wide. Here’s the crucial detail that leads us back to solid truth (rather than politically correct speculation of Afrocentric Negro propaganda): We know that all of the colonies created by these sea-faring tribes were white. If these colonies were white, then the people who spawned them must have been white. This is basic logic and genetics. Hence it is safe to conclude that the Egyptians (the ancestors of the Philistines and the other Hamite nations) were white.
Since those evil forces who push the antichrist narrative that the ancient Egyptians were black cannot refute this mountain of evidence, they ignore it. They also lie and claim that the Phoenicians were Canaanites (and thus were not white). In a similar move, they say the origins of the Philistines are unknown, or perhaps they also were Canaanites. Yet the Bible clearly states that the Philistines descended from Ham through his son Mizraim, or Egypt. Thus we can rest assured that the Philistines were white.
Phut was also a son of Ham. His descendants came to be known as the Libyans. Phut was located to the west of Egypt but his land was overshadowed in strength and size by both Egypt and Ethiopia. The Greeks generally divided Africa into three parts, Egypt, Ethiopia, and Libya. Josephus tells us that we get the name Libya from a son of Mizraim.
“Phut also was the founder of Libya, and called the inhabitants Phutites, from himself: there is also a river in the country of Moors which bears that name; whence it is that we may see the greatest part of the Grecian historiographers mention that river and the adjoining country by the appellation of Phut: but the name it has now has been by change given it from one of the sons of Mesraim, who was called Lybyos” (Antiquities 1.6.2).
Canaan, the last son of Ham, became father to the ancient Canaanites, who lived in Canaan, the lands the Israelites later conquered. Canaan was cursed by his grandfather Noah to be the servant to Shem and Japheth. Because of the curse, it was likely that other Adamic tribes shunned intermarriage with the Canaanites as nobody would want to inherit the curse through marriage. Noah cursed Canaan and his line because Canaan was the result of Noah’s son Ham committing incest with his mother, Noah’s wife. We’ll go into this curse in a later Proof, but for now, you could compare Genesis 9.20-27 with Leviticus 18.7-8 and 20.11.
Like all the Adamic nations, the Canaanites were originally white. Despite the unfortunate circumstances of Canaan’s conception, he was part of Noah’s white genetic line. Canaan had many sons who spread abroad into many lands. By noting the names of the lands they came to possess, we get a picture of the race-mixing that the Canaanites indulged in:
“And Canaan begat Sidon his first born, and Heth, And the Jebusite, and the Amorite, and the Girgasite, And the Hivite, and the Arkite, and the Sinite, And the Arvadite, and the Zemarite, and the Hamathite: and afterward were the families of the Canaanites spread abroad. And the border of the Canaanites was from Sidon, as thou comest to Gerar, unto Gaza; as thou goest, unto Sodom, and Gomorrah, and Admah, and Zeboim, even unto Lasha” Genesis 10:15-19 KJV.
Through their interbreeding with non-Adamic races, the Canaanites became a nation of bastards. The accursed peoples in the lands they entered had no problem intermarrying with the cursed Canaanites. The Canaanite territories included Sodom and Gomorrah, those ancient cities renown for sodomy and sexual perversion which Yahweh destroyed with fire and brimstone as punishment and warning to others. Thus the Canaanites became completely mixed-race (with many tribal names but known collectively as Canaanites) and thoroughly corrupted genetically and lost their white Adamic identity. Knowing this, we can understand why when Joshua led the Israelites into the land of Canaan, Yahweh commanded that no Canaanite be spared.
“When the Lord your God brings you into the land which you go to possess, and has cast out many nations before you, the Hittites and the Girgashites and the Amorites and the Canaanites and the Perizzites and the Hivites and the Jebusites, seven nations greater and mightier than you, and when the Lord your God delivers them over to you, you shall conquer them and utterly destroy them. You shall make no covenant with them nor show mercy to them“ Deuteronomy 7:1-2 KJV.
But the Israelites disobeyed Yahweh; although they defeated and destroyed many Canaanite nations and tribes, they did not exterminate every one of them — man, woman, and child — as Yahweh had ordered. The surviving Canaanites dwelt amongst the Israelites and influenced them for evil. As Yahweh had warned, the Canaanites continually corrupted the society and enticed the Israelites into sin. This included idolatry, sacrificing their children to their god Moloch, and other abominations.
Intermarriage and being able to distinguish between Israelites and Canaanites also became a problem, as the Canaanites had some admixture of white genes and to some degree must have looked like Israelites. However, ancient artwork depicting Canaanites and other tribes from Canaan, such as the Hittites, show their distinctive facial features. They appear white but have notable hooked noses, sloped skulls, and other non-white features that clearly show bastardization. These features can be seen in the modern descendants of these Canaanites who live in our white societies to this day. Because of ancient Israel’s disobedience, these Canaanites — many of whom look white — remain with us, infiltrating our white societies, running and ruining our governments, banks, financial systems, corporations, churches, academic institutions, entertainment empires, news and media businesses, and much more. As is their nature, they continue to work to corrupt our white Christian societies and tempt us into sin.
Shem, son of Noah, had five sons. The Shemites, for the most part, settled in what we now call the Middle East. Many modern scholars and today’s churches present the Shemites as dark, swarthy Arab-looking people (despite the fact that Shem was a white son of white Noah). This fabrication is more obfuscation to pass off Arabs and modern Jews as Shemites and the Jews as the true Israelites. This is a fantasy. Arabs are not white Shemites; modern Jews are not white Shemitic Israelites. In reality, both Arabs and Jews are the result of race-mixing and can no longer be identified with any Adamic tribe or nation, including the Shemites. Although race-mixing occurred throughout the centuries, the Muslim conquest of those regions, around 700 AD, greatly accelerated it. Islam resulted in the entire Middle East becoming “brown” in a short period of time. The Muslims also brought masses of Negro slaves into their lands. This resulted in even more “darkening” over subsequent generations.
“The sons of Shem were Elam, Asshur, Arphaxad, Lud, and Aram” Genesis 10:22 KJV.
Above are the statues of the Persian immortals at the palace of Darius the Great. Notice the blonde blue-eyed Persian soldier on the right.
Elam, son of Shem, was the progenitor of the ancient Persians. In the Bible, when prophecies clearly relate to the Persians, they are called Elam. In Greek legends, Perseus is an ancient legendary figure (the Greek hero who beheaded Medusa) who was said to have lived around the same time period as Dardanus and Cadmus (see Proof 4), who were the leaders of the Israelites who left for Europe right after the Exodus (not all the Israelites followed Moses into the Sinai Desert). The Greeks believed the Persians descended from this mythical Perseus, but once again, these historians did not have the complete story. Thus the Greeks called the Elamites “Persian,” and we have a similar situation to how linguistically Mizraim became Egypt and Cush became Ethiopia.
The Shemitic Persians under Cyrus the Great (c. 600 BC) conquered the Babylonian Empire (who were Chaldeans, likely descendants of Aram, another son of Shem) and later invaded Greece twice, unsuccessfully. They were the last white non-Israelite Adamic people to have a significant empire and rule the Middle East before Alexander the Great’s successful invasion. From Alexander’s time on, the white Israelites ruled the Middle East under the Seleucids and then Parthians, until the Arab conquest and subsequent mongrelization took place.
History describes the Persians as white. Darius the Great, a late Persian King, depicted on a famous vase known as the Darius Vase, had blond hair and pale skin. The Greeks fought the Persians several times in the Greco-Persian Wars, but the Greek historians never described them as dark and swarthy. Rather, the Greeks mocked them for wearing “women’s clothing” because the Persians covered themselves completely to protect themselves from the sun, causing their skin to be very pale. The Greek men, on the other hand, commonly worked and fought in the nude.
Asshur, son of Shem, is the father of the Ayssirans. These white Assyrians worshipped many pagan gods, one of whom was named Assur. Obviously, over the generations, the tribe had forgotten their knowledge of the one true God and turned their original patriarch Asshur into a god (which they spelled Assur, dropping the “h”). The Shemitic Assyrians spread out all over the Middle East, below the Caucasus Mountains. They grew into a formidable empire, which encompassed most of the white Adamic world at that time. In fact, Yahweh used the Assyrians as a tool to punish the Israelites when they transgressed against Him.
Lud, son of Shem, was the father of the Lydians who settled in Anatolia (West Turkey) in Europe. These Shemitic Lydians were the only non-Japethite tribe to settle on a large scale this early in Europe. They are most noted for having an alliance and even intermarriages with the Trojans who arrived many centuries later. The Israelite Dardanus arrived in Anatolia (see Proof 4) and is said to have married a princess, a Lydian daughter of the Lydian king. Since the arrival of the Israelites and Dardanus was around 1400 BC — still early in the dispersion of the tribes — both the Dardanians and Lydians may have still been aware of their common Shemite lineage. The Etruscans in Italy, located above Rome, were a Lydian colony. Thus we can see how the later Romans, who had descended from the Trojans, formed an alliance with their old trusted allies, the Etruscans, since both tribes were Shemites.
Above is an ancient Etruscan Mosaic discovered in Italy.
Since the Etruscans like the Romans lived in white Italy, modern historians don’t try to claim they weren’t white. Instead, the rewriters of history take a different tactic. They try to obscure the origins of the Etruscans. But Greek historian Strabo, who wrote during the transitional period from the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire, clearly traced the Etruscans to the Lydians of Anatolia. And surely, the Romans knew where their neighbors and allies, the Etruscans, came from. Since the Etruscans were white, their Lydian ancestors and the Shemites were all white.
Aram, son of Shem, was the father of the Arameans who lived in the Middle East above the lands of Canaan. Whenever the lands of Aram or the Arameans are mentioned in the Bible, it is generally translated as Syria and Syrians. Syria was the Roman name given to the region. Abraham, our forefather, was called out of Paddan-Aram, which means Planes of Aram. So Abraham was living there with his father and family before Yahweh called him to leave and go south to the lands of Canaan.
The language of Arameans, called Aramaic, was used prolifically throughout the Middle East until the rise of the Assyrian Empire when Akkadian became the lingua franca. From the Aram nation came the Chaldeans. King Nebuchadnezzar and the Chaldeans replaced the Assyrian Empire and rebuilt Babylon. Thus the second Babylon was a Shemitic empire. as opposed to the first Babylon, under Nimrod the Cushite, which was a Hamitic empire.
Interestingly, we can see that each Shemite tribe had its heyday, its reign, and its rule over large swaths of the white Adamic world. First, the Assyrians (Asshur) with the Assyrian Empire; then the Chaldeans (Aram) with the Babylonian Empire; the Persians (Elam) with the Persian Empire; and even the Etruscans (Lud), since they largely intermarried with the Romans and the Romans ruled the world and the Etruscans played a large part with them. However, history shows that all of these empires failed and eventually crumbled. But the Israelite nations formed from the Germanic tribes who became Christian are the only white Adamic nations that have survived unadulterated to this day.
Arphaxad, son of Shem, is the last Shemite patriarch. He was the father of Eber, and from Eber, we get the name Hebrew. Eber was the forefather of Abraham and the Israelites. Interestingly, no records survive of any peoples being named after Arphaxad or any lands bearing his name. Evidently, at some point, these people must have been displaced; therefore, they were the least of all the Adamic nations named in Genesis Chapter 10. The people of Arphaxad had no great history, no great heritage, and no lands called after themselves.
This explains why Abraham (who descended from Arphaxad) dwelt in the lands of Aram as opposed to his own patriarch’s lands. There were no lands of Arphaxad. This gives the context to Yahweh’s statement that He chose the least of all the (Adamic) nations to be His people. “The LORD did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any other people, for you were the least of all peoples” Deut 7:7 KJV. When compared to the exceedingly great Adamic nations and even empires, Abraham and his family were nobodies. Nevertheless, Yahweh chose Abraham and his Shemitic Israelite descendants and made them great and as numerous as the stars. The Israelites have survived to this day and are the modern European people.
Arphaxad the Shemite did have two other descendants we should mention. Arphaxad’s son Eber had two sons, Peleg and Joktan. Peleg’s line led to Abraham and the Israelites. His brother Joktan and his descendants settled in the land we today call Arabia, and they likely identified themselves as Hebrews. Their cousins the Israelites had extensive laws that prevented race-mixing, and Yahweh continuously chastised them when they forsook His law. On the other hand, the descendants of Joktan did not have Yahwey’s law and correction; thus through mixing with darker races, they quickly lost their tribal identity. By King Solomon’s time, Joktan’s land was called Arabia, which means “mixed” or “to darken.” Thus Joktan’s line race-mixed themselves into oblivion fairly early on, which must have been a stern lesson to their cousin Israelites who went on to become the many nations of Europe.
So now you can see that it is entirely possible to trace the history of Noah and his sons and the nations they gave rise to. The beginnings of our race are not hopelessly lost in time. Yahweh preserved our history in the Bible right from when Noah stepped off the ark with God’s commission to restart the white Adamic race. Great Adamic nations came from Noah’s sons, Japheth, Ham, and Shem. We know the names of these nations, their locations, and their histories. We know that the Israelites came from the line of Shem. The Israelites were the white descendants of Shem, who was the white son of the white Noah. So of course we know what the Israelites looked like in the past and look like today. They look as white as any white European man or woman.